Reduction of metal artefacts from bilateral hip prostheses during lower extremity computed tomography angiography: an experimental phantom study

Author:

Abdalqader Omarah N.1,Hjouj Mohammad1,Aljamal Mohammad2ORCID,Hjouj Fawaz3,Abuzaid Mohamed4ORCID,Mousa Mahmoud5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Professions Al‐Quds University Jerusalem Palestine

2. Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences Arab American University Jenin Palestine

3. Department of Mathematics Khalifa University Abu Dhabi UAE

4. Medical Diagnostic Imaging Department, College of Health Sciences University of Sharjah Sharjah UAE

5. Department of Radiology Turkish Friendship Hospital Gaza Strip Palestine

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionImage quality reduction due to metallic artefacts is a significant challenge during vascular computed tomography (CT) imaging of the lower extremities in patients with hip prostheses. This study aims to analyse various reconstruction algorithms' ability to reduce metal artefacts due to two types of hip prostheses during lower extremity CT angiography examinations.MethodsA pelvis phantom was fabricated with the insertion of a tube filled with contrast media to simulate the femoral artery, and the phantom was then CT scanned with and without hip prostheses. Multimodal images were acquired using different kilovoltage peak (kVp) settings and reconstructed with different algorithms, such as filtered back projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction (iDose4), iterative model‐based reconstruction (IMR) and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction (O‐MAR). Image quality was assessed based on image noise, signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and Hounsfield unit (HU) deviation.ResultsThe IMR approach significantly improved image quality compared to iDose4 and FBP. For the vascular region, O‐MAR improves SNR by 5 ± 1, 23 ± 5 and 42 ± 9 for FBP, iDose4 and IMR respectively, and improves HU precision towards the baseline values by 49% and 83% for FBP and IMR, respectively. The noise reduction was 71% and 89% for FBP and IMR, and 57% for iDose4. O‐MAR greatly enhances SNR corrections among the most severe artefacts, with 29 ± 1 and 43 ± 4 for FBP and IMR, compared to iDose4 by 37 ± 7.ConclusionIMR combined with O‐MAR could improve the CT angiography of the lower extremities of patients with a hip prosthesis.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3