Secondary school science teachers' arguments for the particulate nature of matter-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Secondary school science teachers' arguments for the particulate nature of matter

Published:2017-11-16 Issue:4 Volume:55 Page:503-525
ISSN:0022-4308
Container-title:Journal of Research in Science Teaching
language:en
Short-container-title:J Res Sci Teach

Author:

Gunnarsson Robert¹^ORCID,Hellquist Björn¹,Strömdahl Helge¹²,Zelic Dusan¹

Affiliation:

1. School of Education and Communication; Jönköping University; Jönköping Sweden

2. Linköping University; Linköping Sweden

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Education

Reference62 articles.

1. Why do we believe that an atom is colourless? Reflections about the teaching of the particle model;Albanese;Science & Education,1997

2. Pupils' conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 12-16);Andersson;Studies in Science Education,1990

3. Atkins , P. 2010 Chemistry's core ideas 8 12)

4. Saving Mach's view on atoms;Bächtold;Journal of General Philosophy of Science,2010

5. Teachers' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: The case of Zambian pre-service science teachers;Banda;Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching,2011

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Tre typer av argument för materians partikelnatur i kemiundervisning;ATENA Didaktik;2023-10-06

2. Neo-Piagetian Predictors of Students’ Performance in Science Learning: Evidence from Primary Education;Behavioral Sciences;2023-01-11

3. The development of students' justifications for their positions regarding two theoretical models: Electron cloud or sodium chloride crystal—After engaging in different learning activities;Journal of Research in Science Teaching;2019-02-25