Improving evapotranspiration computation with electrical resistivity tomography in a maize field
-
Published:2023-11-28
Issue:1
Volume:23
Page:
-
ISSN:1539-1663
-
Container-title:Vadose Zone Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Vadose Zone Journal
Author:
Chou Chunwei1ORCID,
Peruzzo Luca12ORCID,
Falco Nicola1,
Hao Zhao1,
Mary Benjamin12ORCID,
Wang Jiannan1,
Wu Yuxin1
Affiliation:
1. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley California USA
2. Dipartimento di Geoscienze Università degli Studi di Padova Padova Italy
Abstract
AbstractHydrogeophysical methods have been increasingly used to study subsurface soil–water dynamics, yet their application beyond the soil compartment or the quantitative link to soil hydraulic properties remains limited. To examine how these methods can inform model‐based evapotranspiration (ET) calculation under varying soil water conditions, we conducted a pilot‐scale field study at an experimental maize plot with manipulated irrigation treatments. Our goal was to develop a workflow for (1) acquiring and inverting field electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) data, (2) correlating ERT to soil hydraulic properties, (3) spatially characterizing soil water stress that feeds into ET modeling (the FAO‐56 model), and (4) evaluating the performance of ERT‐based ET computation. Our results showed that ERT was able to capture decimeter‐scale soil water content (SWC) dynamics from root water uptake and irrigation manipulation and the contrast of soil water stress between deficiently and fully irrigated maize. We also demonstrated the flexibility of using ERT to spatially integrate soil water stress in the soil volume of interest, which could be adjusted based on different crops and plot layouts. The integration of the ERT datasets into ET modeling provided insights into the spatial heterogeneity of the subsurface that has been challenging for point‐based sensing, which can further our understanding of the hydraulic dynamics in the soil‐plant‐atmosphere continuum.
Funder
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Laboratory Directed Research and Development
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Science
Biological and Environmental Research