Validating coupled flow theory for bare‐soil evaporation under different boundary conditions

Author:

Blöcher Johanna R.12ORCID,Diamantopoulos Efstathios13ORCID,Durner Wolfgang1ORCID,Iden Sascha C.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Soil Science and Soil Physics, Institute of Geoecology Technische Universität Braunschweig Braunschweig Germany

2. Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Praha‐Suchdol Czech Republic

3. Chair of Soil Physics University of Bayreuth Bayreuth Germany

Abstract

AbstractEvaporation from bare soil is an important hydrological process and part of the water and energy balance of terrestrial systems. Modeling bare‐soil evaporation is challenging, mainly due to nonlinear couplings among liquid water, water vapor, and heat fluxes. Model concepts of varying complexity have been proposed for predicting evaporative water and energy fluxes. Our aim was to test a standard model of coupled water, vapor, and heat flow in the soil using data from laboratory evaporation experiments under different boundary conditions. We conducted evaporation experiments with a sand and a silt loam soil and with three different atmospheric boundary conditions: (i) wind, (ii) wind and short‐wave radiation, and (iii) wind and intermittent short‐wave radiation. The packed soil columns were closed at the bottom (no water flux) and instrumented with temperature sensors, tensiometers, and relative humidity probes. We simulated the evaporation experiments with a coupled water, vapor, and heat flow model, which solves the surface energy balance and predicts the evaporation rate. The evaporation dynamics were predicted very well, in particular the onset of stage‐two evaporation and the evaporation rates during the stage. A continuous slow decrease of the measured evaporation rate during stage‐one could not be described with a constant aerodynamic resistance. Adding established soil resistance parametrizations to the model significantly degraded model performance. The use of a boundary‐layer resistance, which takes into account the effect of point sources of moisture, improved the prediction of evaporation rates for the sandy soil, but not for the silt loam.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Soil Science

Reference63 articles.

1. Allen R. Pereira L. &Smith M.(1998).Crop evapotranspiration—Guidelines for computing crop water requirements(Irrigation and Drainage Paper no. 56).FAO.https://www.fao.org/3/x0490e/x0490e00.htm

2. Temperature Dependence of Water Retention Curves for Wettable and Water-Repellent Soils

3. Coupling of heat, water vapor, and liquid water fluxes to compute evaporation in bare soils

4. Ecological Climatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3