A comprehensive categorization method for identifying near‐fault pulse‐like ground motions

Author:

Peng Yongbo12ORCID,Han Renjie13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering Tongji University Shanghai P.R. China

2. Shanghai Institute of Disaster Prevention and Relief Tongji University Shanghai P.R. China

3. College of Civil Engineering Tongji University Shanghai P.R. China

Abstract

AbstractIdentifying near‐fault pulse‐like ground motions from extensive ground motion databases holds paramount importance, as it provides a pivotal foundation for further inquiries into this specific type of ground motions, including the modeling of such stochastic processes as well as thorough analysis of their potential impact on structures and infrastructure systems. Currently, a diverse array of quantitative methods for identifying pulse‐like ground motions have emerged, all of which demonstrate good accuracy within their respective research scopes. However, due to the limitations of each individual method in identifying specific cases, these diverse approaches often yield inconsistent results for certain ground motion records, posing a significant challenge in establishing a reliable classification criterion that relies solely on a single identification method. To address this issue, the present study adopts a multifaceted approach. Instead of improving a single time‐frequency analysis‐based identification method, it carefully conducts a selection of seven baseline methods through a systematic overview of the field. By leveraging the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a comprehensive categorization method is developed that integrates the strengths of each approach, resulting in a more robust and credible classification criterion. According to the devised category indicator, ground motions can be classified into four categories: Category A comprises definitively pulse‐like ground motions; Category B comprises apparently pulse‐like ground motions; Category C consists of probably pulse‐like ground motions; and Category D encompasses ground motions unlikely to exhibit pulse‐like characteristics. It provides a more elaborate classification beyond the binary distinction of pulse‐like and non‐pulse‐like ground motions associated with traditional onefold classification methods. For validation purposes, a basic dataset comprising near‐fault ground motion records from the NGA‐West 2 database has been utilized. To verify the comprehensive categorization method, two datasets of pulse‐like ground motion records suggested by FEMA and PEER and one dataset of ground motion records collected during the 1999 Chi‐Chi earthquake are addressed. Numerical examples illustrate the remarkable effectiveness of the proposed method in identifying near‐fault pulse‐like ground motions based on their varying degrees of pulse‐like characteristics.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3