“Pitching” posttraumatic stress disorder treatment: A qualitative study of how providers discuss evidence‐based psychotherapies with patients

Author:

Hooyer Katinka1ORCID,Hamblen Jessica23ORCID,Kehle‐Forbes Shannon M.456ORCID,Larsen Sadie E.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Family and Community Medicine Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee Wisconsin USA

2. Executive Division National Center for PTSD White River Junction Vermont USA

3. Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth Dartmouth College Hanover New Hampshire USA

4. Women's Health Sciences Division National Center for PTSD Boston Massachusetts USA

5. Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research Minneapolis VA Health Care System Minneapolis Minnesota USA

6. University of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis Minnesota USA

Abstract

AbstractThe two widely available evidence‐based psychotherapies (EBPs) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are cognitive processing therapy and prolonged exposure. Although the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has invested in intensive clinical training to provide these first‐line treatments, most military veterans do not receive these therapies. Prior research indicates that patient interest and motivation depend on how patients are educated, and differences in how information is presented shape their decision‐making. To our knowledge, no studies have addressed how clinicians “pitch” EBPs for PTSD and examined whether certain approaches are more effective than others. We recorded and thematically analyzed 25 treatment planning sessions across 10 VA sites in the United States to better understand how providers talk to patients about treatment options. Five themes were identified: using rich description, integrating various forms of questioning to engage the patient, sharing prior patient success stories, using inviting and direct language, and tailoring therapy talk to fit patient needs. Providers learning to offer EBPs can use these strategies to serve as a “menu” of options that will allow them to present EBPs in a way that appeals to a particular patient.

Funder

Health Services Research and Development

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3