Association of patient socioeconomic status with outcomes after palliative treatment for disseminated cancer

Author:

Maduka Richard C.12ORCID,Canavan Maureen E.13ORCID,Walters Samantha L.1,Ermer Theresa145,Zhan Peter L.1,Kaminski Michael F.1,Li Andrew X.1,Pichert Matthew D.1,Salazar Michelle C.16,Prsic Elizabeth H.7,Boffa Daniel J.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA

2. Yale Cancer Center Advanced Training Program for Physician Scientist, NIH T32 Fellowship Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA

3. Cancer Outcomes Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Department of Internal Medicine Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA

4. Faculty of Medicine Friedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen Germany

5. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine University of London London UK

6. National Clinician Scholars Program Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA

7. Palliative Care Program, Department of Internal Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPalliative treatment has been associated with improved quality of life and survival for a wide variety of metastatic cancers. However, it is unclear whether the benefits of palliative treatment are uniformly experienced across the US cancer population. We evaluated patterns and outcomes of palliative treatment based on socioeconomic, sociodemographic and treating facility characteristics.MethodsPatients diagnosed between 2008 and 2019 with Stage IV primary cancer of nine organ sites were analyzed in the National Cancer Database. The association between identified variables, and outcomes concerning the administration of palliative treatment were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models.ResultsOverall 238,995 (23.6%) of Stage IV patients received palliative treatment, which increased over time for all cancers (from 20.7% in 2008 to 25.6% in 2019). Palliative treatment utilization differed significantly by region (West less than Northeast, OR: 0.55 [0.54–0.56], p < 0.001) and insurance payer status (uninsured greater than private insurance, OR: 1.35 [1.32–1.39], p < 0.001). Black race and Hispanic ethnicity were also associated with lower rates of palliative treatment compared to White and non‐Hispanics respectively (OR for Blacks: 0.91 [0.90–0.93], p < 0.001 and OR for Hispanics: 0.79 [0.77–0.81] p < 0.001).ConclusionsThere are important differences in the utilization of palliative treatment across different populations in the United States. A better understanding of variability in palliative treatment use and outcomes may identify opportunities to improve informed decision making and optimize quality of care at the end‐of‐life.

Funder

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3