Accessibility to ERCP‐performing hospitals among patients with pancreatic cancer living in SEER regions

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimsThe two most common interventions used to treat painless jaundice from pancreatic cancer are endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). Our study aimed to characterize the geographic distribution of ERCP‐performing hospitals among patients with pancreatic cancer in the United States and the association between geographic accessibility to ERCP‐performing hospitals and biliary interventions patients receive.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)‐Medicare database for pancreatic cancer from 2005 to 2013. Multilevel models were used to examine the association between accessibility to ERCP hospitals within a 30‐ and 45‐min drive from the patient's residential ZIP Code and the receipt of ERCP treatment. A two‐step floating catchment area model was used to calculate the measure of accessibility based on the distribution across SEER regions.Results7464 and 782 patients underwent ERCP and PTBD, respectively, over the study period. There were 808 hospitals in which 8246 patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in SEER regions from 2005 to 2013 received a procedure. Patients with high accessibility within both 30‐ and 45‐min drive to an ERCP‐performing hospital were more likely to receive an ERCP (30‐min adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17–2.01; 45‐min aOR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01–1.70). Furthermore, in the adjusted model, Black patients (vs. White) and patients with stage IV disease were less likely to receive ERCP than PTBD.ConclusionsPatients with pancreatic cancer and high accessibility to an ERCP‐performing hospital were more likely to receive ERCP. Disparities in the receipt of ERCP persisted for Black patients regardless of their access to ERCP‐performing hospitals.