High‐frequency, high‐intensity TENS compared to standard treatment with opioids for postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A multicentre randomized controlled trial

Author:

Ögren C.12ORCID,Varkey E.34,Wolf A.25,Larsson C.6,Ringdal M.57,Andréll P.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care/Pain Centre Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden

2. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Institute of Clinical Sciences at the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

3. Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland Gothenburg Sweden

4. Department of Health and Rehabilitation/Physiotherapy Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

5. Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

6. Region Västra Götaland, Frölunda Specialist Hospital Gothenburg Sweden

7. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Region Västra Götaland, Kungälvs Hospital Kungälv Sweden

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAdverse effects of opioids could prolong the duration of stay in the post‐anaesthesia care unit (PACU). This study aimed to assess time in the PACU and the pain‐relieving effect of high‐frequency, high‐intensity transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (HFHI TENS) versus standard treatment with intravenous (IV) opioids.MethodsPatients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at two Swedish hospitals were invited to participate. Patients reporting postoperative pain intensity ≥3 according to the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in the PACU were randomized to receive standard treatment with IV opioids or HFHI TENS, administered with an intensity of 40–60 mA for 1 min, repeated once if insufficient pain relief. If NRS remained ≥3 after two TENS stimulation the patients received IV opioids.ResultsIn total, 163 patients were randomized to receive HFHI TENS (n = 85) or IV opioids (n = 78). There was no difference between the HFHI TENS group versus the opioid group regarding time in the PACU (138 min [SD 69] vs. 142 min [SD 95], mean difference −4.42 [95% CI–30:22], p = 0.74), time to pain relief NRS < 3 (median 10 min) and pain intensity at PACU discharge (NRS 1.7 [SD 1.45] vs. 1.6 [SD 1.20], p = 0.58). In the HFHI TENS group, 39 patients (46%) needed additional treatment with IV opioids. Mean opioid consumption was significantly lower in the HFHI TENS group than in the opioid group (4.5 vs. 11.0 morphine equivalents; p < 0.001).ConclusionsHFHI TENS may be an opioid‐sparing alternative for postoperative pain relief.Significance StatementIn this multicentre, RCT time in the PACU and the pain‐relieving effect of HFHI TENS was compared to standard treatment with IV opioids. There were no differences between the groups regarding time in the PACU, time to pain relief and side effects but opioid consumption in the HFHI TENS group was significantly lower. Both groups reported high satisfaction with pain treatment and care. In summary, HFHI TENS should be considered a safe, fast‐onsetting, opioid‐sparing option for postoperative pain relief.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3