Optimized lung expansion ventilation modulates ventilation‐induced lung injury in preterm lambs

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPreterm infants close to viability commonly require mechanical ventilation (MV) for respiratory distress syndrome. Despite commonly used lung‐sparing ventilation techniques, rapid lung expansion during MV induces lung injury, a risk factor for bronchopulmonary dysplasia. This study investigates whether ventilation with optimized lung expansion is feasible and whether it can further minimize lung injury. Therefore, optimized lung expansion ventilation (OLEV) was compared to conventional volume targeted ventilation.MethodsTwenty preterm lambs were surgically delivered after 132 days of gestation. Nine animals were randomized to receive OLEV for 24 h, and seven received standard MV. Four unventilated animals served as controls (NV). Lungs were sampled for histological analysis at the end of the experimental period.ResultsVentilation with OLEV was feasible, resulting in a significantly higher mean ventilation pressure (0.7–1.3 mbar). Temporary differences in oxygenation between OLEV and MV did not reach clinically relevant levels. Ventilation in general tended to result in higher lung injury scores compared to NV, without differences between OLEV and MV. While pro‐inflammatory tumor necrosis factor‐α messenger RNA (mRNA) levels increased in both ventilation groups compared to NV, only animals in the MV group showed a higher number of CD45‐positive cells in the lung. In contrast, mean (standard deviations) surfactant protein‐B mRNA levels were significantly lower in OLEV, 0.63 (0.38) compared to NV 1.03 (0.32) (p = .023, one‐way analysis of variance).ConclusionIn conclusion, a small reduction in pulmonary inflammation after 24 h of support with OLEV suggests potential to reduce preterm lung injury.