Comparison of outcomes between single‐incision sling and transobturator sling for treating stress urinary incontinence: A 10‐year prospective study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of outcomes between single‐incision sling and transobturator sling for treating stress urinary incontinence: A 10‐year prospective study

Published:2019-06-24 Issue:7 Volume:38 Page:1852-1858
ISSN:0733-2467
Container-title:Neurourology and Urodynamics
language:en
Short-container-title:Neurourology and Urodynamics

Author:

Sun Zhijing¹,Wang Xiuqi¹,Lang Jinghe¹,Xu Tao²,Zhang Ye¹,Kang Jia¹,Mao Meng¹,Zhu Lan¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical CollegeChinese Academy of Medical Science Beijing China

2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & School of Basic MedicinePeking Union Medical College Beijing China

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology,Clinical Neurology

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/nau.24078

Reference18 articles.

1. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the conservative and nonpharmacological management of female pelvic floor dysfunction

2. Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: AUA/SUFU Guideline

3. Validation of incontinence impact questionnaire short form in Chinese population;Zhu L;Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi,2011