Leveraging the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to Develop the American College of Rheumatology's Toolkit for Implementation of Rheumatoid Arthritis Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Study

Author:

Nasrallah Catherine1ORCID,Schmajuk Gabriela2ORCID,Hamblin Alicia1,Wilson Cherish1ORCID,Kersey Emma1,Young Cammie1ORCID,Katz Patti1ORCID,Bajaj Puneet3ORCID,Downey Christina4ORCID,Bartels Christie5ORCID,Zell JoAnn6,Danila Maria I.7ORCID,Ferguson Sancia5,Barton Jennifer L.8,DeQuattro Kimberly9,Yazdany Jinoos10ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of California San Francisco

2. University of California, San Francisco and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center San Francisco California

3. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas

4. Loma Linda University School of Medicine Loma Linda California

5. University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison

6. University of Colorado Aurora

7. University of Alabama at Birmingham and Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Birmingham Health Care System Birmingham Alabama

8. Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System and Oregon Health & Science University Portland

9. University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia

10. University of California, San Francisco and Center for Vulnerable Populations and Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital San Francisco California

Abstract

ObjectiveDespite the recognized benefits of collecting rheumatoid arthritis (RA) outcomes measures, their use in routine care is inconsistent. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted semistructured interviews with US rheumatologists and practice personnel to assess workflows, opportunities, and challenges in collecting RA outcome measures. Using insights from interviews, we developed the RA Measures Toolkit to enhance their use in clinical practice.MethodsWe invited 138 Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) registry practices and 5 academic medical centers with ≥30 patients eligible for RA outcome measures to participate in the study. Practices were classified based on their performance in quality payment programs. Recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically using deductive and inductive techniques. The findings were used to create the RA Measures Toolkit.ResultsWe conducted 20 interviews with 38 participants across 20 practices. Key themes within the CFIR domains highlighted the challenges and best practices in RA outcome measure collection and included (1) process: the variability in practices’ use of RA outcome measures and the importance of streamlined workflows; (2) intervention: challenges of integrating patient‐reported outcomes into electronic health records; and (3) individual characteristics: importance of clinic culture around quality improvement. Using these data, we developed the RA Measures Toolkit, a multimedia online resource, featuring guidelines, best practices, and educational resources to improve the efficiency of current workflows and to enhance patient care.ConclusionThis study identifies critical gaps in the collection of RA outcome measures in US rheumatology practices and provides actionable recommendations and resources to address challenges via the RA Measures Toolkit.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3