Principles for using evidence to improve biodiversity impact mitigation by business

Author:

White T. B.1ORCID,Petrovan S. O.12ORCID,Bennun L. A.13ORCID,Butterworth T.4,Christie A. P.125ORCID,Downey H.16ORCID,Hunter S. B.7ORCID,Jobson B. R.8,zu Ermgassen S. O. S. E.910ORCID,Sutherland W. J.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

2. Biosecurity Research Initiative at St Catharine's (BioRISC), St Catharine's College University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

3. The Biodiversity Consultancy Cambridge UK

4. WSP London UK UK

5. Downing College University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

6. The Woodland Trust Grantham UK

7. School of Life Sciences University of Sussex Brighton UK

8. Birdlife International Cambridge UK

9. Interdisciplinary Centre for Conservation Science, Department of Biology University of Oxford Oxford UK

10. Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation University of Kent Canterbury UK

Abstract

AbstractThere is an increasing expectation on the private sector to address biodiversity impacts and contribute towards global conservation goals. Appropriate evidence use can help businesses avoid biodiversity losses and realise gains, reduce ineffective or suboptimal action, whilst minimising biodiversity‐related risks and securing opportunities from engaging with biodiversity.We review the status of evidence‐based action in the private sector, where previous studies have identified concerning trends, and explore the barriers that may currently be hindering practice.To learn from this, and improve the status quo, we propose a set of principles for evidence‐based biodiversity impact mitigation. We outline tools and resources that can help businesses move towards evidence‐based practice and achieve each of these principles.Meeting these principles would improve the biodiversity outcomes from businesses' biodiversity related actions. However, for business action to contribute more fully to global conservation goals, broader political and socio‐economic issues also need addressing.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Strategy and Management,Geography, Planning and Development,Business and International Management

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3