Cochrane review: Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Cochrane review: Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants

Published:2008-09 Issue:3 Volume:3 Page:731-808
ISSN:1557-6272
Container-title:Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:Evid.-Based Child Health

Author:

Henderson-Smart DJ,Cools F,Bhuta T,Offringa M

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/ebch.268/fullpdf

Reference67 articles.

1. Prospective randomized comparison of high-frequency oscillatory and conventional ventilation in respiratory distress syndrome;Clark;Pediatrics,1992

2. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth-weight Infants;Courtney;New England Journal of Medicine,2002

3. Early high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in very low birth weight infants: a pilot study of two ventilation protocols;Durand;Journal of Perinatology,2001

4. The sy-fi study: a randomized prospective trial of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus a high-frequency flow interrupter in infants less than 1000 g;Craft;Journal of Perinatology,2003

5. Early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus synchronized mandatory ventilation in very low birth weight infants: a pilot study of two ventilation protocols;Durand;Journal of Perinatology,2001

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. High-frequency Ventilation: Evidence-based Practice and Specific Clinical Indications;NeoReviews;2006-05-01

2. Evaluation and Development of Potentially Better Practices to Prevent Chronic Lung Disease and Reduce Lung Injury in Neonates;Pediatrics;2003-04-01