Using computed tomogram atrial myocardial thickness maps in high‐power short‐duration radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation: UTMOST AF

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundHigh‐power short‐duration (HPSD) ablation creates wide, shallow lesions using radiofrequency (RF) heating. It is uncertain if adjusting RF energy based on atrial wall thickness provides extra benefits. We studied the safety and effectiveness of tailored HPSD energy based on left atrial (LA) wall thickness (LAWT) for circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).MethodsWe enrolled 212 patients (68.4% male, mean age: 59.5 ± 11.0 years) and randomly assigned them to two groups: LAWT‐guided CPVI (WT, n = 108) and conventional CPVI (control, n = 104). Both groups used an open irrigated‐tip deflectable catheter to apply 50 W for 10 s to the posterior LA, while controls used 60 W for 15 s on other LA regions. RF delivery time in WT was titrated (15 s at LAWT > 2.1 mm, 13 s at 1.4–2.1 mm, and 11 s at <1.4 mm) according to the computed tomogram‐myocardial thickness color map.ResultsAfter a mean follow‐up of 13.4 ± 7.0 months, the WT and control groups showed no significant difference regarding clinical recurrence rate (13.9% vs. 5.8%, respectively; p = .061) and major complication rate (4.6% vs. 3.8%, respectively; p > .999). The total procedure time, cardioversion rate, and post‐procedural AAD prescription rates did not significantly differ between the groups.ConclusionsThe LAWT‐guided energy titration strategy did not result in improved procedural safety and efficacy compared to the conventional 50–60 W‐HPSD CPVI in patients with PAF.