What does it mean to be “prepared for work”? Perceptions of new engineers

Author:

Deters Jessica R.1ORCID,Paretti Marie C.2ORCID,Perry Logan A.3ORCID,Ott Robin2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Mechanical and Materials Engineering University of Nebraska—Lincoln Lincoln Nebraska USA

2. Engineering Education Virginia Tech Blacksburg Virginia USA

3. Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Nebraska ‐ Lincoln Lincoln Nebraska USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEngineering education seeks to prepare students for engineering practice, but the concept of preparedness is often ill‐defined. Moreover, findings from studies of different populations or in different contexts vary regarding how well new graduates are prepared. These variations, coupled with the lack of clarity, suggest the need to better understand what it means to be prepared for engineering work.PurposeThis study contributes to research on workplace preparation by exploring how new graduates describe being prepared for engineering work.MethodApplying secondary analysis to data from the multi‐institution Capstone To Work (C2W) project, we used thematic analysis to explore new engineers' descriptions of preparedness. We analyzed written responses to structured questions about the school‐to‐work transition collected weekly during participants' first 12 weeks of work; 105 graduates drawn from four universities provided 956 responses, with a mean of 9 (out of 12 possible) responses per participant.ResultsParticipants' descriptions of preparedness included applying concrete skills, recognizing familiar situations, and having strategies for approaching challenging tasks even when they lacked relevant knowledge or skill.ConclusionOur findings suggest that although many discussions about workplace preparation implicitly focus narrowly on mastery of skills and knowledge, that focus may not fully capture new graduates' experiences, and may limit discussions about the ways in which school can (and cannot) prepare students for work. A more expansive understanding may better support both student learning and workplace onboarding, though more research is needed across stakeholders to establish shared understanding.

Funder

Division of Engineering Education and Centers

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Engineering,Education

Reference71 articles.

1. American Society for Engineering Education. (1994).The green report—Engineering education for a changing world.https://aseecmsduq.blob.core.windows.net/aseecmsdev/asee/media/content/member%20resources/pdfs/the-green-report_1.pdf

2. American Society for Engineering Education. (2013).Transforming undergraduate education in engineering phase I: synthesizing and integrating industry perspectives(Transforming undergraduate education in engineering Issue).https://tuee.asee.org/phase-i/report/

3. American Society for Engineering Education. (2017).Transforming undergraduate education in engineering phase II: Insights from tomorrow's engineers(Transforming undergraduate education in engineering Issue.https://tuee.asee.org/phase-ii/report/

4. American Society for Engineering Education. (2018).Transforming undergraduate education in engineering phase IV: Views of faculty and professional societies(Transforming undergraduate education in engineering Issue.https://tuee.asee.org/phase-iv/report/

5. American Society for Engineering Education. (2020a).ASEE corporate member council survey for skills gaps in recent engineering graduates.https://workforcesummit.asee.org/student-survey/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3