Identification of psychological flexibility and inflexibility profiles during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Author:

Pakenham Kenneth I.1,Landi Giulia23ORCID,Cattivelli Roberto23,Grandi Silvana23,Tossani Eliana23

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychology The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

2. Department of Psychology University of Bologna Bologna Italy

3. Department of Psychology, Laboratory of Psychosomatics and Clinimetrics (head Prof. Silvana Grandi) University of Bologna Cesena Italy

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) wave and lockdown adversely affected the lives of people in diverse ways.AimsThis study used a person‐centered approach to identify patterns of engagement in the 12 psychological flexibility (PF) and inflexibility (PI) processes to manage the first COVID‐19 wave and lockdown hardships.Materials & MethodsA total of 1035 Italian adults completed an online survey.ResultsLatent profile analyses conducted on the 12 PI/PF processes measured by the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory identified five profiles; three reflected gradations of high to low PF with corresponding inverse levels of PI, while two represented more complex relationships between PI and PF. After controlling for relevant socio‐demographic and COVID‐19/lockdown factors, the five profiles differed in mental health (depression, anxiety, and COVID‐19 distress). Essentially a gradient of progressive decreases in all PI processes (except experiential avoidance) corresponded with increments in mental health across all profiles. Two profiles, which evidenced the highest levels of mental health (highly flexible and moderately flexible profiles), also had the greatest proportion of the sample 56.42% (n = 584), and the highest levels of PF and experiential avoidance.DiscussionFindings from this and similar studies suggest intersecting complex relationships among the PI/PF processes that are likely to shift in response to changing contexts. We suggest this network of relationships is better represented by a three‐dimensional PF/PI hexaflex than a simplistic two‐dimensional depiction of the model.ConclusionDistinguishing different PF/PI profiles identified groups most at risk for the adverse mental health impacts of the pandemic and exposed variations in the mental health protective and risk roles of PF and PI processes, respectively, that can inform ACT‐based mental health promotion interventions.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Clinical Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3