Cardiac and mortality outcome differences between methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone prescriptions in patients with an opioid use disorder

Author:

Wang Lindsey1,Volkow Nora D.2,Berger Nathan A.1,Davis Pamela B.3,Kaelber David C.4,Xu Rong5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Science, Health, and Society, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA

2. National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland USA

3. Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA

4. The Center for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The MetroHealth System Cleveland Ohio USA

5. Center for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA

Abstract

AbstractImportanceMore than 109,000 Americans died of drug overdose in 2022, with 81,231 overdose deaths involving opioids. Methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone are the most widely used medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD) and the most effective intervention for preventing overdose deaths. However, there is a concern that methadone results in long QT syndrome, which increases the risk for fatal cardiac arrythmias. Currently few studies have systematically evaluated both the short‐term and long‐term differences in cardiac and mortality outcomes between MOUD.ObjectivesTo compare the risks of cardiac arrythmias, long QT syndrome and overall mortality between patients with opioid use disorders (OUD) who were prescribed methadone, buprenorphine or naltrexone.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsRetrospective cohort study based on a multicenter and nationwide database of electronic health records (EHRs) in the United States. The study population was comprised of 144,141 patients who had medical encounters for OUD in 2016‐2022, were prescribed MOUD within 1 month following a medical encounter for OUD diagnosis and had no diagnosis of cardiac arrythmias or long QT syndrome before any MOUD prescription. The study population was divided into three cohorts: (1) Methadone cohort (n = 40,938)—who were only prescribed methadone. (2) Buprenorphine cohort (n = 80,055)—who were only prescribed buprenorphine. (3) Naltrexone cohort (n = 5,738)—who were only prescribed naltrexone.Exposuresmethadone, buprenorphine, or naltrexone.Main Outcomes and MeasuresCardiac arrythmias, long QT syndrome, and death. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of outcomes at six different follow‐up time frames (1‐month, 3‐month, 6‐month, 1‐year, 3‐year, and 5‐year) by comparing propensity‐score matched cohorts using Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis.ResultsPatients with OUD who were prescribed methadone had significantly higher risks of cardiac arrhythmias, long QT syndrome and death compared with propensity‐score matched patients with OUD who were prescribed buprenorphine or naltrexone. For the 1‐month follow‐up, the overall risk for cardiac arrythmias was 1.03% in the Methadone cohort, higher than the 0.87% in the matched Buprenorphine cohort (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.04−1.39); The overall risk for long QT syndrome was 0.35% in the Methadone cohort, higher than the 0.15% in the matched Buprenorphine cohort (HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.75−3.28); The overall mortality was 0.59% in the Methadone cohort, higher than the 0.41% in the matched Buprenorphine cohort (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.21−1.81). The increased risk persisted for 5 years: cardiac arrhythmias (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.23−1.38), long QT syndrome (HR: 3.14, 95% CI: 2.76−3.58), death (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.41−1.59).Conclusions and RelevanceMethadone was associated with a significantly higher risk for cardiac and mortality outcomes than buprenorphine and naltrexone. These findings are relevant to the development of guidelines for medication selection when initiating MOUD treatment and inform future medication development for OUD that minimizes risks while maximizing benefits.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Clinical Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3