Affiliation:
1. Melanoma Surgical Unit Department of Surgery Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano Milan Italy
2. Bicocca Applied Statistics Center Università degli Studi di Milano‐Bicocca Milan Italy
3. Department of Pathology Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano Milan Italy
4. Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV‐IRCCS Padova Italy
5. Dermatology Clinic of the Turin University Hospital Turin Italy
6. University of Perugia Medical Oncology Unit Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia Perugia Italy
7. General and Oncological Surgery Unit Morgagni‐Pierantoni Hospital Forli Italy
8. Department of Dermatology ASST Sette Laghi Varese Italy
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThis study aimed to improve the understanding of the prognostic value of tumor mitotic rate (TMR) in cutaneous melanoma and assessed its significance as a predictor for overall, melanoma‐specific, and recurrence‐free survival.Patients and MethodsThis is a retrospective multicenter Italian cohort study of 13,016 patients diagnosed with and treated for invasive primary melanoma between 2005 and 2020 with median follow‐up of 5.5 years. The survival probability was assessed by Kaplan–Meier method, hazard ratios (HRs), and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) of all‐cause mortality and recurrence/death by multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsHigher dermal mitoses number was associated with decreased overall survival. Among patients with TMR 0/mm2, 1/mm2, 2/mm2–3/mm2, 4/mm2–10/mm2, and >10/mm2, 5‐year overall survival (OS) was 97.3%, 93.6%, 88.3%, 73.0%, and 60.9%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, compared to TMR of 0/mm2, HRs for all‐cause mortality were 1.35 (95% CI, 1.08–1.68), 1.70 (95% CI, 1.40–2.07), 2.04 (95% CI, 1.67–2.49), and 2.39 (95% CI, 1.90–3.00) for 1 mitoses/mm2, 2 mitoses/mm2–3 mitoses/mm2, 4 mitoses/mm2–10 mitoses/mm2, and >10 mitoses/mm2, respectively. A similar increase in risks was observed in melanoma‐specific survival (MSS) and recurrence‐free survival (RFS). The HRs for MSS and RFS for the highest compared to the lowest TMR category were 3.01 (95% CI, 2.20–4.11) and 2.26 (95% CI, 1.88–2.73), respectively. Sentinel lymph‐node biopsy positivity was significantly associated with TMR increase even with adjustment for several potential confounders.ConclusionsA clear association was demonstrated between an increasing TMR and decreased OS, MSS, and RFS, suggesting a reconsideration of TMR prognostic role for future inclusion in the melanoma staging system.Plain Language Summary
The 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer for melanoma staging removed tumor mitotic rate (TMR) from the staging criteria for T1 melanomas, giving way to ulceration and tumor thickness as stronger prognostic predictors.
However, it is still recommended that TMR should be assessed and recorded in all primary invasive melanomas.
In a large retrospective multicenter study on primary invasive melanomas, we investigated the prognostic value of TMR to assess its significance as survival predictor.
Our results showed a clear association between increasing TMR and decreased patients' survival, suggesting that TMR should be considered for inclusion in the melanoma staging system.