The feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a self‐advocacy serious game for women with advanced breast or gynecologic cancer

Author:

Thomas Teresa Hagan12ORCID,Bender Catherine1,Donovan Heidi S.13,Murray Patty Jo1,Taylor Sarah34,Rosenzweig Margaret13,Sereika Susan M.1,Brufsky Adam34,Schenker Yael25

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

2. Palliative Research Center University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

3. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Magee‐Womens Hospital Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

4. Division of Hematology/Oncology School of Medicine University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

5. Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics Division of General Internal Medicine School of Medicine University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCancer clinicians and systems aim to provide patient‐centered care, but not all patients have the self‐advocacy skills necessary to ensure their care reflects their needs and priorities. This study examines the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a self‐advocacy serious game (an educational video game) intervention in women with advanced breast or gynecologic cancer.MethodsWomen with recently diagnosed (<3 months) metastatic breast or advanced gynecologic cancer were randomized 2:1 to receive a tablet‐based serious game (Strong Together) (n = 52) or enhanced care as usual (n = 26). Feasibility was based on recruitment, retention, data completion, and intervention engagement. Acceptability was assessed via a postintervention questionnaire and exit interview. Preliminary efficacy was assessed on the basis of change scores from baseline to 3 and 6 months in self‐advocacy (Female Self‐Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship Scale) using intention‐to‐treat analysis.ResultsSeventy‐eight women (55.1% with breast cancer; 44.9% with gynecologic cancer) were enrolled. Feasibility was demonstrated by satisfactory recruitment (69% approach‐to‐consent rate; 93% enroll‐to‐randomize rate), retention (90% and 86% at 3 and 6 months, respectively; 85% data completion), and intervention engagement (84% completed ≥75% of the game). Participants endorsed the intervention’s (75%) and trial’s (87%) acceptability. Participants in the intervention group experienced significant improvements in self‐advocacy at 3 and 6 months compared to participants in the control group.ConclusionsStrong Together is feasible and acceptable among women with advanced breast or gynecologic cancer. This intervention demonstrates promising evidence of clinical efficacy. A future confirmatory trial is warranted to test the efficacy of the intervention for patient and health system outcomes.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference42 articles.

1. Why The Nation Needs A Policy Push On Patient-Centered Health Care

2. A Conceptual Framework of Self-advocacy in Women With Cancer

3. Self‐Advocacy: A Cancer Survivor’s Handbook. National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship. Published online 2009.https://www.canceradvocacy.org/wp‐content/uploads/2013/01/Self_Advocacy.pdf

4. Effect of a Patient-Centered Communication Intervention on Oncologist-Patient Communication, Quality of Life, and Health Care Utilization in Advanced Cancer

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3