Estimating current effective sizes of large populations from a single sample of genomic marker data: A comparison of estimators by simulations

Author:

Wang Jinliang1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London London UK

Abstract

AbstractGenome‐wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) data are increasingly used in estimating the current effective population sizes (Ne) for informing the conservation of endangered species and guiding the management of exploited species. Previous assessments of sibship frequency (SF) and linkage disequilibrium (LD) estimators of Ne focused on small populations where genetic drift is strong and thus Ne is easy to estimate. Genomic single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data provide ample information and hold the potential for application of these estimators to large populations where genetic drift is rather weak and thus Ne is difficult to estimate. In this study, I simulated very large populations and sampled a widely variable number of individuals (genotyped at 10,000 SNPs) for estimating Ne by both SF and LD methods. I also considered the more realistic situation where a population experiences a bottleneck, and where marker data suffer from genotyping errors. The simulations show that both SF and LD methods can yield accurate Ne estimates of very large populations when sampled individuals are sufficiently numerous. When n is much smaller than Ne, however, Ne estimates are in a bimodal distribution with a substantial proportion of the estimates being infinitely large. For a population with a bottleneck, LD estimator overestimates and underestimates the Ne of the parental population from samples taken at and after the bottleneck, respectively. LD estimator also overestimates Ne substantially when applied to data suffering from allelic dropouts and false alleles. In contrast, SF estimator is unbiased and accurate when populations are changing in size or markers suffer from genotyping errors.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3