A shift towards softer pest management differently benefits earwig and spider communities in a multiyear experiment in apple orchards

Author:

Simon Sylvaine1ORCID,Riotord Dominique1,Morel Karine1,Fleury Amandine1,Capowiez Yvan2

Affiliation:

1. UERI Gotheron, INRAE Saint‐Marcel‐lès‐Valence France

2. UMR EMMAH, INRAE‐Université d'Avignon Avignon France

Abstract

AbstractBACKGROUNDEnvironmentally‐friendly crop protection practices are needed to enhance the sustainability of current agricultural systems. This is crucial in orchards which are extensively treated to impair various pests, at the expense of natural enemies. However, the effect of a shift towards softer pest management on the beneficial arthropod community is poorly documented. Earwigs (Dermaptera: Forficulidae) and spiders (Araneae) are relevant groups to assess such effects because they are highly sensitive to agricultural practices. They were monitored for 6 and 4 years, respectively, in apple orchards under three pest management regimes: Organic, Low‐input and Conventional, with pest management being switched during the survey from a broad‐spectrum insecticide schedule to mating disruption in the latter one, and more selective compounds in all orchards.RESULTSThe survey displayed that earwig abundance (mainly Forficula auricularia) that was initially very low in the Conventional orchard (annual mean 0.5–1.7 earwigs per shelter in the 2010–2012 period) increased to the same level as that of Low‐input and Organic orchards (over 10 earwigs per shelter) in the same year that changes in pest management occurred. The epigeal and arboreal spider communities were not responsive, and no recovering was observed 4 years after change in practices.CONCLUSIONPredatory arthropod communities are differently affected over time by changes in pest management, most probably due to their biology (dispersion, reproduction rate, susceptibility to pesticides etc.). This outlines the importance of documenting the time required to recover after perturbations and build a natural enemy community to enhance pest control in a win‐win perspective. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference65 articles.

1. Pesticides, environment, and food safety

2. Agroecological crop protection for sustainable agriculture

3. EIP European Innovation Partnership‐AGRI Focus Group Sustainable ways to reduce pesticides in pome and stone fruit production. Final report September 2022 European Community Agriculture & Innovation(2022).https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/en/publications/eip‐agri‐workshop‐sustainable‐ways‐reduce.html[Accessed 1 February 2024].

4. AlaphilippeA BelienT IoriattiCandMalavoltaC Crop Specific Technical Guidelines for Integrated Production of Pome Fruits 6th edition. Edited by: Alaphilippe A Belien T Ioriatti C and Malavolta C with the support of the IOBC‐WPRS WGs specifically the Sub‐Group on ‘Pome Fruit Arthropods’ (2019)https://iobc‐wprs.org/ip‐tools/general‐and‐crop‐specific‐ip‐guidelines/pome‐fruits/Accessed 1 February 2024.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3