Affiliation:
1. UERI Gotheron, INRAE Saint‐Marcel‐lès‐Valence France
2. UMR EMMAH, INRAE‐Université d'Avignon Avignon France
Abstract
AbstractBACKGROUNDEnvironmentally‐friendly crop protection practices are needed to enhance the sustainability of current agricultural systems. This is crucial in orchards which are extensively treated to impair various pests, at the expense of natural enemies. However, the effect of a shift towards softer pest management on the beneficial arthropod community is poorly documented. Earwigs (Dermaptera: Forficulidae) and spiders (Araneae) are relevant groups to assess such effects because they are highly sensitive to agricultural practices. They were monitored for 6 and 4 years, respectively, in apple orchards under three pest management regimes: Organic, Low‐input and Conventional, with pest management being switched during the survey from a broad‐spectrum insecticide schedule to mating disruption in the latter one, and more selective compounds in all orchards.RESULTSThe survey displayed that earwig abundance (mainly Forficula auricularia) that was initially very low in the Conventional orchard (annual mean 0.5–1.7 earwigs per shelter in the 2010–2012 period) increased to the same level as that of Low‐input and Organic orchards (over 10 earwigs per shelter) in the same year that changes in pest management occurred. The epigeal and arboreal spider communities were not responsive, and no recovering was observed 4 years after change in practices.CONCLUSIONPredatory arthropod communities are differently affected over time by changes in pest management, most probably due to their biology (dispersion, reproduction rate, susceptibility to pesticides etc.). This outlines the importance of documenting the time required to recover after perturbations and build a natural enemy community to enhance pest control in a win‐win perspective. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.
Reference65 articles.
1. Pesticides, environment, and food safety
2. Agroecological crop protection for sustainable agriculture
3. EIP European Innovation Partnership‐AGRI Focus Group Sustainable ways to reduce pesticides in pome and stone fruit production. Final report September 2022 European Community Agriculture & Innovation(2022).https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/en/publications/eip‐agri‐workshop‐sustainable‐ways‐reduce.html[Accessed 1 February 2024].
4. AlaphilippeA BelienT IoriattiCandMalavoltaC Crop Specific Technical Guidelines for Integrated Production of Pome Fruits 6th edition. Edited by: Alaphilippe A Belien T Ioriatti C and Malavolta C with the support of the IOBC‐WPRS WGs specifically the Sub‐Group on ‘Pome Fruit Arthropods’ (2019)https://iobc‐wprs.org/ip‐tools/general‐and‐crop‐specific‐ip‐guidelines/pome‐fruits/Accessed 1 February 2024.