Triggering daily online adaptive radiotherapy in the pelvis: Dosimetric effects and procedural implications of trigger parameter‐value selection

Author:

Yock Adam D.1,Ahmed Mahmoud1,Masick Sarah1,Morales‐Paliza Manuel1,Kluwe Christien1,Shinde Ashwin1,Kirschner Austin1,Shinohara Eric1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiation Oncology Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundOnline adaptive radiotherapy (ART) can address dosimetric consequences of variations in anatomy by creating a new plan during treatment. However, ART is time‐ and labor‐intensive and should be implemented in a resource‐conscious way. Adaptive triggers composed of parameter‐value pairs may direct the judicious use of online ART.PurposeThis work analyzed our clinical experience using CBCT‐based daily online ART to demonstrate how a conceptual framework based on adaptive triggers affects the dosimetric and procedural impact of ART.MethodsSixteen patients across several pelvic sites were treated with CBCT‐based daily online ART. Differences in standardized dose metrics were compared between the original plan, the original plan recalculated on the daily anatomy, and an adaptive plan. For each metric, trigger values were analyzed in terms of the proportion of treatments adapted and the distribution of metric values.ResultsTarget coverage metrics were compromised due to anatomic variation with the average change per treatment ranging from ‐0.90 to ‐0.05 Gy, ‐0.47 to ‐0.02 Gy, ‐0.31 to ‐0.01 Gy, and ‐12.45% to ‐2.65% for PTV D99%, PTV D95%, CTV D99%, and CTV V100%, respectively. These were improved using the adaptive plan (‐0.03 to 0.01 Gy, ‐0.02 to 0.00 Gy, ‐0.03 to 0.00 Gy, and ‐4.70% to 0.00%, respectively). Increasingly strict triggers resulted in a non‐linear increase in the proportion of treatments adapted and improved the distribution of metric values with diminishing returns. Some organ‐at‐risk (OAR) metrics were compromised by anatomic variation and improved using the adaptive plan, but changes in most OAR metrics were randomly distributed.ConclusionsDaily online ART improved target coverage across multiple pelvic treatment sites and techniques. These effects were larger than those for OAR metrics, suggesting that maintaining target coverage was our primary benefit of CBCT‐based daily online ART. Analyses like these can determine online ART triggers from a cost‐benefit perspective.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Instrumentation,Radiation

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3