Comparative assessment of grain quality in tannin versus non‐tannin sorghums in the sorghum association panel

Author:

S. Impa M.1ORCID,Bean Scott R.2ORCID,loerger B. P.2,Hayes Chad3,Emendack Yves3,Jagadish S. V. Krishna1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plant and Soil Science Texas Tech University Lubbock Texas USA

2. Center for Grain and Animal Health Research USDA‐ARS Manhattan Kansas USA

3. USDA‐ARS Cropping Systems Research Lab Lubbock Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesThe presence of antinutritional compounds such as tannins reduce the nutritional benefits in sorghum. Hence, the major objective was to evaluate the differences in grain quality and physical parameters in 254 tannin and non‐tannin accessions in a diverse set of sorghum association panel.FindingsWide variability was noticed for total protein (11%–19%) and protein digestibility (13%–78%). Tannin content recorded a significant negative relationship (R2 = 0.65, p < .001) with protein digestibility, indicating strong impact of tannins on protein digestibility in sorghum accessions with a pigmented testa. Non‐tannin accessions exhibited higher protein content, protein digestibility, kernel hardness, kernel weight and diameter, and lower phenolics compared to tannin accessions. Among the genetic races, Durra had the highest protein digestibility and Caudatum had the highest kernel weight than other races. In accessions with tannin, red grains had the highest tannin content and lowest protein digestibility than other colored grains.ConclusionsThe study revealed accessions with high protein digestibility of around 71% in both non‐tannin and tannin groups. A tannin containing accession SC1056 had the highest protein digestibility (78%) coupled with high kernel hardness.Significance and NoveltyAccessions with above‐average protein digestibility, either with or without tannins could be ideal donors for breeding for improved grain quality in sorghum.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Organic Chemistry,Food Science

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3