Electroencephalographic compatibility with fitness to drive: A nationwide survey among Swiss neurologists

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe Swiss guidelines for driving with epilepsy require that electroencephalogram (EEG) findings must be compatible with the fitness to drive (FTD) without specifying any criteria. This nationwide survey investigated how Swiss neurologists implement this requirement in clinical practice.MethodsAn online survey, including 19 EEG examples and statements about the compatibility of the EEG with FTD, was distributed to all members of the Swiss Society of Clinical Neurophysiology and all Swiss neurological clinics with residency programs. Descriptive statistics and Fleiss' Kappa for inter‐rater agreement were performed.Results102 participants (37% female, 45% <45 years) completed the survey, with 15% primarily working in a specialized epileptology center (EPI), 55% in a hospital setting without epileptological focus (HOS), and 30% in private practice (PP). Most participants of all three groups regarded EEG normal variants as compatible with FTD, while hyperventilation‐induced rhythmic slowing and some pathological patterns (e.g., frontal and temporal intermittent rhythmic delta activity [FIRDA, TIRDA], focal interictal epileptiform discharges [IED], focal seizure) were evaluated more heterogeneously. The EEG inter‐rater agreement for EPI was 0.4; 0.31 for PP; and 0.24 for HOS. No consensus was found for acceptable duration for generalized or focal IEDs. Among all participants, evaluation by an epilepsy center (85%) and reaction‐time testing (67%) were evaluated as the most useful additional examinations. However, reaction‐time testing is rarely or never performed by 58%. Most supported EEG results as part of the FTD assessment and demanded more research (both 82%).SignificanceOur survey indicates considerable heterogeneity among Swiss neurologists when evaluating the EEG findings for FTD. Inter‐rater agreement in all three groups was fair, with highest agreement among epileptologists. We noted a discrepancy between the usefulness and actual application of reaction‐time testing. More training and research are warranted to achieve rater‐independent consistency for FTD evaluation.Plain Language SummaryIn Switzerland, neurologists must consider the findings from EEG (brain waves) exams to evaluate driving safety in people with epilepsy. We surveyed Swiss neurologists, asking their opinions on this matter. We found that opinions differ among individual doctors, with the highest agreement among epilepsy specialists. We also found that some additional tests, such as reaction‐time testing, are perceived as useful but are rarely performed. The participating neurologists supported considering EEG results for driving fitness assessments but favored more precise guidelines and research.