Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery fellows' case logs remained stable during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionDuring the COVID‐19 pandemic and subsequent staffing shortages there was concern about the case volume, and thus competency, of graduating trainees due to reduced surgical volumes. Elective procedures were particularly affected, which includes Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS) cases. To understand whether FPMRS fellows were affected, we assessed their case logs for changes during the pandemic.MethodsThe nationally aggregated case logs of graduating FPMRS fellows, both urology and obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN), were obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. The available academic years (AYs) included 2018−2019, 2019−2020, and 2020−2021. Standard deviation for each index category was derived from the average and 90th percentile data. One‐way analysis of variance was used to compare differences in case volumes for tracked index categories between AYs.ResultsGraduating fellows logged an average of 517.4 (standard deviation [SD] 28.6) and 818.0 (SD 37.9) cases, for urology and OBGYN respectively, over their fellowship training during the examined period. No significant differences in total surgical procedures were found for either specialty between pre‐COVID AY 2018−2019 and COVID‐affected AYs 2019−2020 and 2020‐2021. For urology fellows, gastrointestinal (GI) procedures was the only index case category with a significant difference, and it was a decrease between the two COVID‐affected AYs: 2020‐2021 compared to 2019−2020 (8.9 vs. 4.2, p = 0.04). For both urology and OBGYN fellows, there was a statistically significant decrease in graft/mesh augmentation procedures from COVID‐affected AY 2019−2020 to AY 2020−2021. This may be attributed to the reclassification of mesh removal cases from graft/mesh augmentation procedures to genital procedures in 2020−2021. There was not a significant decrease in these procedures from pre‐COVID AY 2018‐2019 to the COVID‐affected AYs. There were no other statistically significant differences between AYs for OBGYN fellows.ConclusionsSurgical case volumes for FPMRS urology and OBGYN fellows who trained during the COVID‐19 pandemic were comparable to those of their pre‐pandemic peers. No significant differences between pre‐COVID and COVID‐affected years were found for either total surgical procedures or index case categories. Despite disruptions in health care nationwide, FPMRS trainee case volumes were largely unaffected.