How to decide whether a systematic review is stable and not in need of updating: Analysis of Cochrane reviews-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

How to decide whether a systematic review is stable and not in need of updating: Analysis of Cochrane reviews

Published:2020-09-15 Issue:6 Volume:11 Page:884-890
ISSN:1759-2879
Container-title:Research Synthesis Methods
language:en
Short-container-title:Res Syn Meth

Author:

Babić Andrija¹,Poklepovic Pericic Tina²,Pieper Dawid³^ORCID,Puljak Livia⁴^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Emergency Medicine in Split‐Dalmatia County Split Croatia

2. Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health University of Split School of Medicine Split Croatia

3. Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine Witten/Herdecke University Cologne Germany

4. Center for Evidence‐Based Medicine and Health Care Catholic University of Croatia Zagreb Croatia

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Education

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jrsm.1451

Reference13 articles.

1. Reproducibility of search strategies of non-Cochrane systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals is suboptimal: primary methodological study

2. Updating Classification System: guide to applying to Cochrane Reviews. Version: July 8 2016. Cochrane Editorial Unit. Cochrane.https://community.cochrane.org/sites/default/files/uploads/inline-files/Cochrane_UCS-Guide_8Jul16_0.pdf.

3. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of non‐Cochrane updates of systematic reviews: A cross‐sectional study

4. Time-to-update of systematic reviews relative to the availability of new evidence

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Determining the conclusiveness of a meta-analysis;JBI Evidence Synthesis;2024-03

2. Clinical and methodological implications for research elements in systematic reviews on COVID-19 treatment were often unstructured and under-reported: a metaresearch study;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2024-02

3. Evaluation of ‘implications for research’ statements in systematic reviews of interventions in advanced cancer patients – a meta-research study;BMC Medical Research Methodology;2023-12-20

4. Evaluation of ‘implications for research’ sections in systematic reviews of interventions in advanced cancer patients – a meta-research study;2023-04-27

5. Definition, harms, and prevention of redundant systematic reviews;Systematic Reviews;2023-04-04