Affiliation:
1. Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
2. Department of Radiation Oncology Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
3. Head and Neck Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundPrimary fit tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) is widely preferred for individuals who have not undergone prior radiation. However, there is no consensus on the relative utility of primary‐fit TEP in the setting of salvage laryngectomy.MethodsA retrospective, single‐center review was conducted of individuals undergoing laryngectomy with primary fit TEP between 2012 and 2018. Multivariable analysis was conducted to compare short‐term and long‐term complications, as well as speech and swallowing outcomes, of those who underwent primary versus salvage laryngectomy.ResultsIn this study, 134 patients underwent total laryngectomy with primary fit TEP. Aside from a higher rate of peristomal dehiscence (13.1% vs. 1.4%) found in the salvage group, there was no difference in incidence of all other complications, including pharyngocutaneous fistula formation. The groups had comparable speech and swallow outcomes.ConclusionPrimary fit TEP is a safe and effective surgical choice for individuals undergoing salvage laryngectomy who desire a voice prosthesis.