Affiliation:
1. Center for Limnology University of Wisconsin–Madison Madison Wisconsin USA
2. Núcleo de Ecologia Aquática e Pesca da Amazônia Federal University of Pará Belém Pará Brazil
3. Great Lakes Research Center Michigan Technological University Houghton Michigan USA
4. Nature Coast Biological Station University of Florida Cedar Key Florida USA
5. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences The University of Tennessee–Knoxville Knoxville Tennessee USA
6. Department of Environmental Sciences Louisiana State University Baton Rouge Louisiana USA
7. Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences Louisiana State University Baton Rouge Louisiana USA
8. Department of Biological Sciences University of North Carolina at Charlotte Charlotte North Carolina USA
9. Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium Chauvin Louisiana USA
10. St. Andrew and St. Joseph Bays Estuary Program Florida State University Panama City Panama City Florida USA
Abstract
AbstractCoastal wetlands are rapidly disappearing worldwide due to a variety of processes, including climate change and flood control. The rate of loss in the Mississippi River Delta is among the highest in the world and billions of dollars have been allocated to build and restore coastal wetlands. A key question guiding assessment is whether created coastal salt marshes have similar biodiversity to preexisting, reference marshes. However, the numerous biodiversity metrics used to make these determinations are typically scale dependent and often conflicting. Here, we applied ecological theory to compare the diversity of different assemblages (surface and below‐surface soil microbes, plants, macroinfauna, spiders, and on‐marsh and off‐marsh nekton) between two created marshes (4–6 years old) and four reference marshes. We also quantified the scale‐dependent effects of species abundance distribution, aggregation, and density on richness differences and explored differences in species composition. Total, between‐sample, and within‐sample diversity (γ, β, and α, respectively) were not consistently lower at created marshes. Richness decomposition varied greatly among assemblages and marshes (e.g., soil microbes showed high equitability and α diversity, but plant diversity was restricted to a few dominant species with high aggregation). However, species abundance distribution, aggregation, and density patterns were not directly associated with differences between created and reference marshes. One exception was considerably lower density for macroinfauna at one of the created marshes, which was drier because of being at a higher elevation and having coarser substrate compared with the other marshes. The community compositions of created marshes were more dissimilar than reference marshes for microbe and macroinfauna assemblages. However, differences were small, particularly for microbes. Together, our results suggest generally similar taxonomic diversity and composition between created and reference marshes. This provides support for the creation of marsh habitat as tools for the maintenance and restoration of coastal biodiversity. However, caution is needed when creating marshes because specific building and restoration plans may lead to different colonization patterns.
Funder
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Subject
Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献