Recommendations from the ERAS® Society for standards for the development of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines

Author:

Brindle M.12ORCID,Nelson G.3,Lobo D. N.45ORCID,Ljungqvist O.67,Gustafsson U. O.89ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

2. Department of Community Health Sciences, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

3. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

4. Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK

5. University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK

6. Department of Surgery, Örebro University and University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden

7. Institute of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

8. Department of Surgery, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

9. Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

Abstract Background ERAS® Society guidelines are holistic, multidisciplinary tools designed to improve outcomes after surgery. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach was initially developed for colorectal surgery and has been implemented successfully across a large number of settings, resulting in improved patient outcomes. As the ERAS approach is increasingly being adopted worldwide and new guidelines are being generated for new populations, there is a need to define an ERAS® Society guideline and the methodology that should be followed in its development. Methods The ERAS® Society recommended approach for developing new guidelines is based on the creation of multidisciplinary guideline development groups responsible for defining topics, planning the literature search, and assessing the quality of the evidence. Results Clear definitions for the elements of an ERAS guideline involve multimodal and multidisciplinary approaches impacting on multiple patient outcomes. Recommended methodology for guideline development follows a rigorous approach with systematic identification and evaluation of evidence, and consensus-based development of recommendations. Guidelines should then be evaluated and reviewed regularly to ensure that the best and most up-to-date evidence is used consistently to support surgical patients. Conclusion There is a need for a standardized, evidence-informed approach to both the development of new ERAS® Society guidelines, and the adaptation and revision of existing guidelines.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3