Good Quality Care for Cancer Patients Dying in Hospitals, but Information Needs Unmet: Bereaved Relatives’ Survey within Seven Countries

Author:

Haugen Dagny Faksvåg12ORCID,Hufthammer Karl Ove3ORCID,Gerlach Christina4ORCID,Sigurdardottir Katrin2ORCID,Hansen Marit Irene Tuen12,Ting Grace5,Tripodoro Vilma Adriana67ORCID,Goldraij Gabriel89ORCID,Yanneo Eduardo Garcia10,Leppert Wojciech1112ORCID,Wolszczak Katarzyna13,Zambon Lair14,Passarini Juliana Nalin15,Saad Ivete Alonso Bredda15ORCID,Weber Martin4,Ellershaw John516ORCID,Mayland Catriona Rachel51617ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Medicine (K1), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

2. Regional Centre of Excellence for Palliative Care, Western Norway, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

3. Centre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

4. Interdisciplinary Palliative Care Unit, III. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany

5. Academic Palliative and End-of-Life Care Department, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool

6. Pallium Latinoamérica, Buenos Aires, Argentina

7. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas Alfredo Lanari, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

8. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina

9. Instituto Universitario de Ciencias Biomédicas de Córdoba, Argentina

10. Mutualista Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay

11. Department of Palliative Medicine, Collegium Medicum, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland

12. Department of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland

13. Sue Ryder House, Pallmed, Bydgoszcz, Poland

14. Department of Internal Medicine, Campinas State University, Campinas, Brazil

15. Sumaré State Hospital, Campinas, Brazil

16. Palliative Care Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool

17. Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield

Abstract

Abstract Background Recognized disparities in quality of end-of-life care exist. Our aim was to assess the quality of care for patients dying from cancer, as perceived by bereaved relatives, within hospitals in seven European and South American countries. Materials and Methods A postbereavement survey was conducted by post, interview, or via tablet in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, U.K., Germany, Norway, and Poland. Next of kin to cancer patients were asked to complete the international version of the Care Of the Dying Evaluation (i-CODE) questionnaire 6–8 weeks postbereavement. Primary outcomes were (a) how frequently the deceased patient was treated with dignity and respect, and (b) how well the family member was supported in the patient's last days of life. Results Of 1,683 potential participants, 914 i-CODE questionnaires were completed (response rate, 54%). Approximately 94% reported the doctors treated their family member with dignity and respect “always” or “most of the time”; similar responses were given about nursing staff (94%). Additionally, 89% of participants reported they were adequately supported; this was more likely if the patient died on a specialist palliative care unit (odds ratio, 6.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.3–17.8). Although 87% of participants were told their relative was likely to die, only 63% were informed about what to expect during the dying phase. Conclusion This is the first study assessing quality of care for dying cancer patients from the bereaved relatives’ perspective across several countries on two continents. Our findings suggest many elements of good care were practiced but improvement in communication with relatives of imminently dying patients is needed. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03566732). Implications for Practice Previous studies have shown that bereaved relatives’ views represent a valid way to assess care for dying patients in the last days of their life. The Care Of the Dying Evaluation questionnaire is a suitable tool for quality improvement work to help determine areas where care is perceived well and areas where care is perceived as lacking. Health care professionals need to sustain high quality communication into the last phase of the cancer trajectory. In particular, discussions about what to expect when someone is dying and the provision of hydration in the last days of life represent key areas for improvement.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3