Psychological distress following multi‐gene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk

Author:

Carlsson Lindsay12,Bedard Philippe L.134,Kim Raymond H.34567,Metcalfe Kelly28

Affiliation:

1. Phase 1 Drug Development Program Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto Ontario Canada

2. Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

3. Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto Ontario Canada

4. Department of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

5. Sinai Health System Toronto Ontario Canada

6. Hospital for Sick Children Toronto Ontario Canada

7. Ontario Institute of Cancer Research Toronto Ontario Canada

8. Women's College Research Institute Toronto Ontario Canada

Abstract

AbstractAdvances in our understanding of the genetic landscape of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) have led to the clinical adoption of multi‐gene panel testing. Panel testing introduces new sources of genetic uncertainty secondary to the inclusion of moderate‐ and low‐penetrance genes, as well as the increased likelihood of identifying a variant of uncertain significance (VUS). This cross‐sectional study explored the post‐test psychological functioning of women who underwent multi‐gene panel testing for HBOC susceptibility genes. Two hundred and ninety‐five women who underwent panel testing within the previous 2 years completed a study questionnaire to measure levels of cancer‐related and genetic testing‐related distress using the Impact of Events Scale (IES) and the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA), respectively. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between genetic test results and levels of psychological distress captured by the IES and MICRA. In this cohort, a pathogenic variant (PV) was identified in 41 (14%) of participants, and 77 (26%) participants were found to have a VUS. In the multi‐variate model, higher mean levels of genetic testing‐related distress were observed in individuals with a PV (p < 0.001) or a VUS (p = 0.007) compared to those with a negative result. Furthermore, participants with a PV in a moderate‐penetrance gene were found to have higher levels of genetic testing‐related distress compared to those with a PV in a high‐risk gene (p = 0.03). Overall, participants were highly satisfied with their genetic testing experience, with 92% of individuals reporting they would recommend testing to others. Our findings highlight differences in psychological outcomes based on both variant pathogenicity and gene penetrance, which contribute to our understanding of the impact of panel testing and sources of both cancer‐related and genetic testing‐related distress secondary to testing.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3