Tell your story: Metrics of success for academic data science collaboration and consulting programs

Author:

Blake Mara Rojeski1ORCID,Griffith Emily23ORCID,Pierce Steven J.4ORCID,Levy Rachel3,Parker Micaela5,Huebner Marianne46ORCID

Affiliation:

1. NC State University Libraries Raleigh North Carolina USA

2. NC State Department of Statistics Raleigh North Carolina USA

3. NC State Data Science Academy Raleigh North Carolina USA

4. Center for Statistical Training and Consulting Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA

5. Academic Data Science Alliance Seattle Washington USA

6. Department of Statistics and Probability Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA

Abstract

Measuring success plays a central role in justifying and advocating for a statistical or data science consulting or collaboration program (SDSP) within an academic institution. We present several specific metrics to report to targeted audiences to tell the story for success of a robust and sustainable program. While gathering such metrics includes challenges, we discuss potential data sources and possible practices for SDSPs to inform their own approaches. Emphasizing essential metrics for reporting, we also share the metric gathering and reporting practices of two programs in greater detail. New or existing SDSPs should evaluate their local environments and tailor their practice to gathering, analysing and reporting success metrics accordingly. This approach provides a strong foundation to use success metrics to tell compelling stories about the SDSP and enhance program sustainability. The area of success metrics provides ample opportunity for future research projects that leverage qualitative methods and consider mechanisms for adapting to the changing landscape of data science.

Funder

Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Reference25 articles.

1. American Library Association. (2006a).Intellectual freedom principles for academic libraries: An interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights [Position statement]. Retrieved 14 March 2024 fromhttp://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/intellectual

2. American Library Association. (2006b).Library Bill of Rights [Position statement]. Retrieved 14 March 2024 fromhttp://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/librarybill

3. American Library Association. (2007).Core values [Position statement]. Retrieved 14 March 2024 fromhttp://www.ala.org/advocacy/privacy/values

4. American Library Association. (2017).Proficiencies for assessment in academic libraries [Position statement]. Retrieved 14 March 2024 fromhttp://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/assessment_proficiencies

5. American Statistical Association. (2018).Overview of statistics as a scientific discipline and practical implications for the evaluation of faculty excellence [Position statement]. Retrieved 14 March 2024 fromhttps://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/POL-Statistics-as-a-Scientific-Discipline.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3