Dexamethasone versus methylprednisolone for critical asthma: A single center, open‐label, parallel‐group clinical trial

Author:

Roddy Meghan R.1,Sellers Austin R.2,Darville Kristina K.3,Teppa‐Sanchez Beatriz3,McKinley Scott D.4,Martin Meghan5,Goldenberg Neil A.267,Nakagawa Thomas A.8,Sochet Anthony A.239

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Pharmacy Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital St. Petersburg Florida USA

2. Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital St. Petersburg Florida USA

3. Departments of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital St. Petersburg Florida USA

4. Departments of Pulmonlogy Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital St. Petersburg Florida USA

5. Departments of Emergency Medicine Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital St. Petersburg Florida USA

6. Departments of Pediatrics Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

7. Departments of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

8. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine University of Florida‐Jacksonville Jacksonville Florida USA

9. Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEvidence for the use of dexamethasone for pediatric critical asthma is limited. We sought to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of dexamethasone versus methylprednisolone among children hospitalized in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for critical asthma.MethodsA prospective, single center, open‐label, two‐arm, parallel‐group, nonrandomized trial among children ages 5−17 years hospitalized within the PICU from April 2019 to December 2021 for critical asthma consented to receive methylprednisolone (standard care) or dexamethasone (intervention) at a 2:1 allocation ratio, respectively. The intervention arm received intravenous dexamethasone 0.25 mg/kg/dose (max: 15 mg/dose) every 6 h for 48 h and the standard care arm intravenous methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg/dose every 6 h (max dose: 60 mg/dose) for 5 days. Study endpoints were clinical efficacy (i.e., length of stay [LOS], continuous albuterol duration, and a composite of adjunctive asthma interventions) and safety (i.e., corticosteroid‐related adverse events).ResultsNinety‐two participants were analyzed of whom 31 were allocated to the intervention arm and 61 the standard care arm. No differences in demographics, clinical characteristics, or acute/chronic asthma severity indices were observed. Regarding efficacy and safety endpoints, no differences in hospital LOS, continuous albuterol duration, adjunctive asthma intervention rates, or corticosteroid‐related adverse events were noted. Compared to the intervention arm, participants in the standard care arm more frequently were prescribed corticosteroids at discharge (72% vs. 13%, p < 0.001).ConclusionsAmong children hospitalized for critical asthma, dexamethasone appears safe and warrants further investigation to fully assess clinical efficacy and potential advantages over commonly applied agents such as methylprednisolone.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference35 articles.

1. United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Most recent national asthma data; [updated 2021 Mar 30; cited 2022 May 1]. 2017–2019 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).https://www.cdc.gov/asthma/most_recent_national_asthma_data.htm

2. Factors associated with length of stay for pediatric asthma hospitalizations

3. The Joint Commission Children’s Asthma Care Quality Measures and Asthma Readmissions

4. Status of Childhood Asthma in the United States, 1980–2007

5. Critical Asthma Syndrome in the ICU

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3