Concordance in detection of microsatellite instability by PCR and NGS in routinely processed tumor specimens of several cancer types

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMicrosatellite instability (MSI) occurs in several cancer types and is commonly used for prognosis and as a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint therapy.MethodsWe analyzed n = 263 formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tumor specimens (127 colorectal cancer (CRC), 55 endometrial cancer (EC), 33 stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD), and 48 solid tumor specimens of other tumor types) with a capillary electrophoresis based multiplex monomorphic marker MSI‐PCR panel and an amplicon‐based NGS assay for microsatellite instability (MSI+). In total, n = 103 (39.2%) cases with a known defect of the DNA mismatch repair system (dMMR), determined by a loss in protein expression of MSH2/MSH6 (n = 48, 46.6%) or MLH1/PMS2 (n = 55, 53.4%), were selected. Cases with an isolated loss of MSH6 or PMS2 were excluded.ResultsThe overall sensitivity and specificity of the NGS assay in comparison with the MSI‐PCR were 92.2% and 98.8%. With CRC cases a nearly optimal concordance was reached (sensitivity 98.1% and specificity 100.0%). Whereas EC cases only show a sensitivity of 88.6% and a specificity of 95.2%, caused by several cases with instability in less than five monomorphic markers, which could be difficult to analyze by NGS (subtle MSI+ phenotype).ConclusionsMSI analysis of FFPE DNA by NGS is feasible and the results show a high concordance in comparison with the monomorphic marker MSI‐PCR. However, cases with a subtle MSI+ phenotype, most frequently manifest in EC, have a risk of a false‐negative result by NGS and should be preferentially analyzed by capillary electrophoresis.