Immediate mobilization in post‐anesthesia care unit does not increase overall postoperative physical activity after elective colorectal surgery: A randomized, double‐blinded controlled trial within an enhanced recovery protocol

Author:

Wilnerzon Thörn Rose‐Marie1ORCID,Forsberg Anette1,Stepniewski Jan2,Hjelmqvist Hans3,Magnuson Anders45,Ahlstrand Rebecca3,Ljungqvist Olle6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physiotherapy Faculty of Medicine and Health Örebro University Örebro Sweden

2. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Örebro University Hospital Örebro Sweden

3. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Faculty of Medicine and Health Örebro University Örebro Sweden

4. Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Medical Sciences Örebro University Örebro Sweden

5. Faculty of Medicine and Health Örebro University Örebro Sweden

6. Department of Surgery School of Medical Sciences Örebro University Örebro Sweden

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe level of post‐operative mobilization according to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines is not always achieved. We investigated whether immediate mobilization increases postoperative physical activity. The objective was to evaluate the effects of immediate postoperative mobilization in the post‐anesthesia care unit (PACU) compared to standard care.MethodsThis randomized controlled trial, involved 144 patients, age ≥18 years, undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Patients were randomized to mobilization starting 30 min after arrival in the PACU, or to standard care. Standard care consisted of mobilization a few hours later at the ward according to ERAS guidelines. The primary outcome was physical activity, in terms of number of steps, measured with an accelerometer during postoperative days (PODs) 1–3. Secondary outcomes were physical capacity, functional mobility, time to readiness for discharge, complications, compliance with the ERAS protocol, and physical activity 1 month after surgery.ResultsWith the intention‐to‐treat analysis of 144 participants (median age 71, 58% female) 47% underwent laparoscopic‐or robotic‐assisted surgery. No differences in physical activity during hospital stay were found between the participants in the intervention group compared to the standard care group (adjusted mean ratio 0.97 on POD 1 [95% CI, 0.75–1.27], p = 0.84; 0.89 on POD 2 [95% CI, 0.68–1.16], p = 0.39, and 0.90 on POD 3 [95% CI, 0.69–1.17], p = 0.44); no differences were found in any of the other outcome measures.ConclusionsAddition of the intervention of immediate mobilization to standard care did not make the patients more physically active during their hospital stay.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NTC 03357497.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3