Case–control matching‐guided exposure‐efficacy relationship for avelumab in patients with urothelial carcinoma

Author:

Soltantabar Pooneh1ORCID,Alhadab Ali2,Hibma Jennifer3,Roychoudhury Satrajit1,Wang Diane D.1,Bello Carlo1,Elmeliegy Mohamed1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Oncology Research and Development, Clinical Pharmacology, Pfizer Inc San Diego California USA

2. Global Development, Janssen R & D San Diego California USA

3. Clinical Pharmacology and Bioanalytics, Pfizer Inc San Diego California USA

Abstract

AbstractExposure‐response (E‐R) analyses are an integral component of understanding the benefit/risk profile of novel oncology therapeutics. These analyses are typically conducted using data from the treatment arm to characterize the relationship between drug exposure (low vs. high) and efficacy or safety outcomes. For example, outcomes of patients with lower exposure in the treatment arm (e.g., Q1) might be compared to outcomes of those with higher drug exposure (Q2, Q3, and Q4). Outcomes from the lowest exposure quartile may be also compared to the control arm to evaluate whether the Q1 subgroup derived clinical benefit. However, the sample size and the distribution of patient baseline characteristics and disease risk factors are not balanced in such a comparison (Q1 vs. control), which may bias the analysis and causal interpretation of clinical benefit in the Q1 subgroup. Herein, we report the use of case–control matching to account for this bias and better understand the E‐R relationship for avelumab in urothelial carcinoma, a PD‐L1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of several cancers. Data from JAVELIN‐100 was utilized which is a phase III study of avelumab in first‐line maintenance treatment in patients with urothelial carcinoma; this clinical study demonstrated superiority of avelumab versus best‐supportive care leading to approval in the United States, Europe, and other countries. A post hoc case‐control matching method was implemented to compare the efficacy outcome between Q1 avelumab subgroup and matched patients extracted from the control arm with similar baseline characteristics, which showed a clinically relevant difference in overall survival in favor of the Q1 avelumab subgroup. This analysis demonstrates the importance of accounting for imbalance in important baseline covariates when comparing efficacy outcomes between subgroups within the treatment arm versus the control arm.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Modeling and Simulation

Reference24 articles.

1. FDA's project optimus. Accessed September 1 2023.https://www.fda.gov/about‐fda/oncology‐center‐excellence/project‐optimus

2. Eviction and the Necessary Conditions for Health

3. BlumenthalG.Optimizing dosing in oncology drug development. 1–142021.

4. Optimizing benefit/risk in oncology: Review of post-marketing dose optimization and reflections on the road ahead

5. Oncology dose optimization paradigms: knowledge gained and extrapolated from approved oncology therapeutics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3