The inter‐laboratory validation study of EpiSensA for predicting skin sensitization potential

Author:

Mizumachi Hideyuki1ORCID,Watanabe Mika2,Ikezumi Mayu2,Kajiwara Michika2,Yasuda Michiyo2,Mizuno Makoto3ORCID,Imai Noriyasu3ORCID,Sakuma Megumi3,Shibata Momoko3,Watanabe Shin‐ichi4,Motoyama Junko4,Basketter David5,Eskes Chantra6,Hoffmann Sebastian7,Lehmann David M.8,Ashikaga Takao9,Sozu Takashi10,Takeyoshi Masahiro11ORCID,Suzuki Sho1,Miyazawa Masaaki1,Kojima Hajime9

Affiliation:

1. R&D Safety Science Research Kao Corporation 2606 Akabane, Ichikai‐Machi Haga‐Gun Tochigi 321‐3497 Japan

2. Food and Drug Safety Center Hatano Research Institute 729‐5 Ochiai Hadano Kanagawa 257‐8523 Japan

3. Safety and Analytical Research Laboratories KOSÉ Corporation 48‐18 Sakae‐cho, Kita‐ku Tokyo 114‐0005 Japan

4. Safety Research Science Laboratory LION Corporation 100 Tajima Odawara‐shi Kanagawa 256‐0811 Japan

5. DABMEB Consultancy Ltd., Kingswood Gloucestershire GL12 8RN UK

6. Services and Consultation on Alternative Methods (SeCAM) Magliaso, Switzerland and Swiss 3R Competence Centre (3RCC) Bern Switzerland

7. seh consulting + services Stembergring 15 Paderborn 33106 Germany

8. Office of Research and Development US Environmental Protection Agency 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park NC 27709 USA

9. Japanese Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods (JaCVAM) National Institute of Health Sciences 3‐25‐26 Tonomachi Kawasaki‐ku Kanagawa 210‐9501 Japan

10. Department of Information and Computer Technology Faculty of Engineering Tokyo University of Science Katsushika‐ku Tokyo 125‐0051 Japan

11. Chemicals Assessment and Research Center Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute (CERI) 1600 Shimotakano, Sugito‐machi Kitakatsushika‐gun Saitama 345‐0043 Japan

Abstract

AbstractThe Epidermal Sensitization Assay (EpiSensA) is a reconstructed human epidermis (RhE)‐based gene expression assay for predicting the skin sensitization potential of chemicals. Since the RhE model is covered by a stratified stratum corneum, various kinds of test chemicals, including lipophilic ones and pre‐/pro‐haptens, can be tested with a route of exposure akin to an in vivo assay and human exposure. This article presents the results of a formally managed validation study of the EpiSensA that was carried out by three participating laboratories. The purpose of this validation study was to assess transferability of the EpiSensA to new laboratories along with its within‐ (WLR) and between‐laboratory reproducibility (BLR). The validation study was organized into two independent stages. As demonstrated during the first stage, where three sensitizers and one non‐sensitizer were correctly predicted by all participating laboratories, the EpiSensA was successfully transferred to all three participating laboratories. For Phase I of the second stage, each participating laboratory performed three experiments with an identical set of 15 coded test chemicals resulting in WLR of 93.3%, 93.3%, and 86.7%, respectively. Furthermore, when the results from the 15 test chemicals were combined with those of the additional 12 chemicals tested in Phase II of the second stage, the BLR for 27 test chemicals was 88.9%. Moreover, the predictive capacity among the three laboratories showed 92.6% sensitivity, 63.0% specificity, 82.7% accuracy, and 77.8% balanced accuracy based on murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) results. Overall, this validation study concluded that EpiSensA is easily transferable and sufficiently robust for assessing the skin sensitization potential of chemicals.

Funder

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Toxicology

Reference29 articles.

1. Haptens, prohaptens and prehaptens, or electrophiles and proelectrophiles

2. Categorization of Chemicals According to Their Relative Human Skin Sensitizing Potency

3. Casati S. Aschberger K. Asturiol D. Basketter D. Dimitrov S. Dumont C. Karlberg A.‐T. Lepoittevin P. Patlewicz G. Roberts D.W. &Worth A.(2016).Ability of non‐animal methods for skin sensitisation to detect pre‐ and pro‐haptens. Report and Recommendations of an EURL ECVAM Expert Meeting. Joint Research Centre Technical Reports 1‐30.https://doi.org/10.2788/01803

4. Environmental Protection Agency. (2018).Interim Science Policy: Use of Alternative Approaches for Skin Sensitization as a Replacement for Laboratory Animal Testing.

5. European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM). (2013).Appendix 2 (Experimental Design) of the h‐CLAT Validation Study Report.https://tsar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/test-method/tm2008-05

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3