Preclinical teaching of periodontal surgical concepts using common instructional models: A comparative assessment

Author:

Eswaran Sridhar1,Dowlatshahi Sahar1,Weltman Robin2,Zhu Liang3,Elangovan Satheesh14,Lee Chun‐Teh1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Periodontics and Dental Hygiene University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Dentistry Houston Texas USA

2. Department of Clinical Sciences University of Nevada School of Dental Medicine Las Vegas Nevada USA

3. Biostatistics and Epidemiology Research Design Core, Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences Department of Internal Medicine Medical School The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA

4. University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics Iowa City Iowa USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesSome commonly used models utilized for teaching periodontal surgical techniques to dental students include pig mandible and periodontal typodonts. Currently, no study compares the learning and teaching outcomes following the use of one model to the other. This study is aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of the preclinical laboratory component on student understanding of concepts taught in the periodontal surgical course and assessing students’ and faculty members’ satisfaction with the instructional models.MethodsAs part of the surgical periodontics course, 98 students took the final exam, with eighty students participating in only the pig mandible session and twenty‐three students participating in both the pig jaw mandible and an additional session utilizing periodontal typodonts under the supervision of ten periodontal faculty members. Examination scores of students attending or not attending the laboratory session were analyzed by a two‐sample t‐test. A questionnaire evaluating the effectiveness of both models was given to faculty members and students who participated in both laboratory sessions. These results were analyzed by paired t‐test.ResultsParticipation in the laboratory sessions did not significantly impact the final exam scores (p = 0.722). Students who had better didactic performance in the course performed better in the final exam, irrespective of laboratory participation. Both students and faculty members preferred typodont to the pig mandibles in learning or teaching periodontal surgical concepts, but both felt gaining flap management and flap refection experience to be better with the pig mandible model without statistical significance (p = 0.119 and p = 0.070, respectively).ConclusionWithin the limitations of this study, we can conclude that laboratory sessions did not significantly improve student performance on the exam. Students and faculty members generally gave positive feedback on both instructional models. Periodontal typodont could be an alternative model for teaching dental students, periodontal surgical concepts.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3