Website blocking in the European Union: Network interference from the perspective of Open Internet

Author:

Ververis Vasilis123ORCID,Lasota Lucas1,Ermakova Tatiana4,Fabian Benjamin5

Affiliation:

1. Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany

2. Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society Berlin Germany

3. Critical Infrastructure Lab, Department of Media University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

4. Hochschule fü r Technik und Wirtschaft (HTW) Berlin Berlin Germany

5. Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau (TH Wildau) Wildau Germany

Abstract

AbstractBy establishing an infrastructure for monitoring and blocking networks in accordance with European Union (EU) law on preventive measures against the spread of information, EU member states have also made it easier to block websites and services and monitor information. While relevant studies have documented Internet censorship in non‐European countries, as well as the use of such infrastructures for political reasons, this study examines network interference practices such as website blocking against the backdrop of an almost complete lack of EU‐related research. Specifically, it performs and demonstrates an analysis for the total of 27 EU countries based on three different sources. They include first, tens of millions of historical network measurements collected in 2020 by Open Observatory of Network Interference volunteers from around the world; second, the publicly available blocking lists used by EU member states; and third, the reports issued by network regulators in each country from May 2020 to April 2021. Our results show that authorities issue multiple types of blocklists. Internet Service Providers limit access to different types and categories of websites and services. Such resources are sometimes blocked for unknown reasons and not included in any of the publicly available blocklists. The study concludes with the hurdles related to network measurements and the nontransparency from regulators regarding specifying website addresses in blocking activities.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Health Policy,Public Administration,Health (social science)

Reference128 articles.

1. Aceto G. Botta A. Pescapè A. Awan M. F. Ahmad T. &Qaisar S.(2016). Analyzing Internet censorship in Pakistan. InResearch and technologies for society and industry(pp.1–6).IEEE.https://wpage.unina.it/giuseppe.aceto/pub/aceto2016analyzing.pdf

2. AGCOM. (2021 June).Report on the activities carried out by the authority in the field of open Internet.https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/78867

3. AGCOM. (2023 January).Provvedimenti.https://www.agcom.it/provvedimenti-a-tutela-del-diritto-d-autore

4. Agenzia delle dogane e dei Monopoli. (2021a June).https://www1.adm.gov.it/files_siti_inibiti/elenco_siti_inibiti.txt

5. Agenzia delle dogane e dei Monopoli. (2021b June).https://www1.agenziadoganemonopoli.gov.it/files_siti_inibiti_tabacchi/elenco_siti_inibiti.txt

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3