Author:
Ackerman Bruce H.,Buono Felicia A. Dello
Abstract
To enhance knowledge in the area of in vitro testing of antibiotics and to understand the limitations of available methods for susceptibility testing, we conducted a MEDLINE literature search in the English language to accumulate relevant articles. Headings searched included microbial sensitivity tests; Kirby‐Bauer; laboratory tests; antiinfective agents; antibiotics, combined; microbiological techniques; blood bactericidal assay; and pharmacology, clinical. The management of patients with serious life‐threatening infections can be complicated by recent changes in organism nomenclature, newly marketed antibiotics, and new isolation and sensitivity testing methods. With the addition of formulary constraints, many problems and controversies arise regarding interpretation of antibiotic sensitivity results. Comprehensive care for infected patients requires assessment of current antibiotic therapy and options for alternative therapy. By applying pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic knowledge to known limits of in vitro testing results, the clinician is able to select the most efficient antibiotic or antibiotic combination.
Reference161 articles.
1. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing trends and accuracy in the United States. A review of the College of American Pathologists Microbiology Surveys, 1972–1989;Jones RN;Arch Pathol Lab Med,1991
2. Pseudoresistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resulting from degradation of imipenem in an automated susceptibility testing system with predried panels
3. New vistas for bacteriologists: analysis based on comparisons of 16s rRNA sequences provides a rapid and reliable approach to identify human pathogens;Wilson KH.;ASM News,1992
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献