Disparities Between Prenatal Ultrasound and Autopsy Findings in Pregnancies Resulting in Fetal Loss

Author:

Kedar Sade Eliel1ORCID,Lantsberg Daniel23,Tagar Sar‐el Moriel4,Gefen Sheizaf56,Katorza Eldad67

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology The Edith Wolfson Medical Center, affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Holon, Israel, Affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel

2. The Royal Women's Hospital University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

4. Department of Dermatology Sheba Medical Center Ramat‐Gan Israel

5. Department of Internal Medicine “E” Tel Aviv Medical Center Tel Aviv Israel

6. Sackler School of Medicine Tel‐Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel

7. Gertner Institute for Epidemiology & Health Policy, Sheba Medical Center Ramat‐Gan Israel

Abstract

ObjectivesThis retrospective study aimed to assess disparities between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings in pregnancies that resulted in fetal loss, and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of prenatal ultrasound using postmortem examinations as a gold standard.MethodsOur study included 136 autopsy cases following a fetal loss that occurred at our tertiary medical center for 8 years. A comparison between the prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings was made, and all cases were classified according to the degree of agreement. The diagnostic performance of prenatal ultrasound was calculated at the level of organ system and specific malformations.ResultsThe primary sonographic diagnosis was confirmed in 91.9% of the cases (n = 125). General agreement was highest among central nervous system (CNS), cardiovascular and musculoskeletal systems (85.7%, n = 36, 18, and 12, respectively) and lowest among facial, multiple anomalies, genitourinary and gastrointestinal systems (50.0%, 74.3%, 78.6%, and 80.0%, n = 2, 26, 11, and 4, respectively). The sensitivity of ultrasound was highest in the CNS (93.2%) and musculoskeletal (87.0%) and lowest in the facial (32.3%) and pulmonary (13.0%) systems. Specifically, low diagnostic rates were noted in detecting ventriculomegaly, valvular anomalies, renal dysplasia, spleen and adrenal anomalies, and digital and facial defects.ConclusionsOur study observed an overall high agreement between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy while contributing to our comprehensive understanding of its strengths and limitations across various types of organ systems and specific malformations.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3