Affiliation:
1. Digital Health Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Mexico City Mexico
2. Our Lady of Fatima University Valenzuela City Philippines
3. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas Universidad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina
4. Indiana University Bloomington Indiana USA
5. Manipal Academy of Higher Education Kasturba Medical College Mangalore Karnataka India
6. Department of Radiology University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA
7. College of Medicine University of Sharjah Sharjah United Arab Emirates
8. Department of Internal Medicine RWJBH Rutgers Health CMC Toms River New Jersey USA
9. Department of Medical Education Hamad Medical Corporation Doha Qatar
10. Government Medical College and Hospital Chandigarh India
11. Internal Medicine Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center Brooklyn New York USA
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia worldwide. Omega‐3 fatty acids (n‐3‐PUFA) are essential to normal neural development and function. Souvenaid®, a medical supplement that contains n‐3‐PUFA's: eicosatetraenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), has emerged as an alternative, slowing cognitive decline in AD patients. In this study, we investigated the effect of dietary supplementation with n‐3‐PUFA, EPA, DHA, and Souvenaid® in AD patients.AimThis systematic review and meta‐analysis aim to establish the relationship between n‐3‐PUFA, EPA, DHA, and Souvenaid® with cognitive effects, ventricular volume and adverse events in AD patients.MethodsA systematic search of randomized control trials (RCT), cohorts, and case–control studies was done in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase for AD adult patients with dietary supplementation with n‐3‐PUFA, EPA, DHA, or Souvenaid® between 2003 and 2024.ResultsWe identified 14 studies with 2766 subjects aligned with our criteria. Most publications described positive cognitive outcomes from supplements (58%). The most common adverse events reported were gastrointestinal symptoms. CDR scale showed reduced progression of cognitive decline (SMD = −0.4127, 95% CI: [−0.5926; −0.2327]), without subgroup differences between different dietary supplement interventions. ADCS‐ADL, MMSE, ADAS‐cog, adverse events, and ventricular volume did not demonstrate significant differences. However, Souvenaid® showed a significant negative effect (SMD = −0.3593, 95% CI: −0.5834 to −0.1352) in ventricular volumes.ConclusionsThe CDR scale showed reduced progression of cognitive decline among patients with n‐3‐PUFA supplemental interventions, with no differences between different n‐3‐PUFA supplements.
Reference43 articles.
1. The epidemiology of Alzheimer's disease modifiable risk factors and prevention;Zhang XX;J Prev Alzheimers Dis,2021
2. 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures
3. Omega-3 fatty acids and cognitive function
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献