Affiliation:
1. Department of Economics University of Namibia Windhoek Khomas Region Namibia
2. Department of Quantitative Techniques University of Yaoundé II Soa Cameroon
Abstract
AbstractThis paper examines the implications of keeping‐up with the Joneses for household food spending using a nationally representative data for Cameroon. Specifically, it employs the heteroskedasticity‐based identification strategy to address the endogeneity of relative deprivation and the recentred influence function (RIF) regression to account for heterogeneity in the effect of relative deprivation across percentiles. Mean regression results show that relative deprivation has a negative effect on food spending overall and the effect is stronger among rural households compared with urban households. The RIF regression results reveal that relative deprivation correlates negatively with food spending from the lower percentile up to 70th percentile, meanwhile, at the upper tail of the distribution, it has no significant effect. These findings have public policy implications for the taxation of luxury goods.
Subject
Development,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference34 articles.
1. How much do we care about absolute versus relative income and consumption?
2. Relative deprivation in Tanzania: Relative concerns and empathy
3. More than 1 billion people are hungry in the world: But what if the experts are wrong?;Banerjee A.;Foreign Policy,2011
4. The Economic Lives of the Poor
5. Bellet C. &Sihra E.(2016).Less food for more status caste inequality and conspicuous consumption in India. Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire D'evaluation des Politiques Publique (LIEPP) Working Paper no.56.