The mental health needs of healthcare workers: When evidence does not guide policy. A comparative assessment of selected European countries

Author:

Kuhlmann Ellen12ORCID,Falkenbach Michelle34,Brînzac Monica‐Georgiana56,Correia Tiago27ORCID,Panagioti Maria8,Ungureanu Marius‐Ionut256ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Economics, Labour and Culture Goethe‐University Frankfurt Frankfurt Germany

2. WHO Collaborating Center for Health Workforce Policies and Planning Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical (IHMT) Universidade Nova de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal

3. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Brussels Belgium

4. Department of Health Management and Policy University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

5. Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences Department of Public Health Babeș‐Bolyai University Cluj‐Napoca Romania

6. Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences Center for Health Workforce Research and Policy Babeș‐Bolyai University Cluj‐Napoca Romania

7. Global Health and Tropical Medicine Associate Laboratory in Translation and Innovation Towards Global Health Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical Universidade Nova de Lisboa Lisboa Portugal

8. Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care University of Manchester Manchester UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe healthcare workforce (HCWF) globally is facing high stress levels and deteriorating mental health due to workplace, labour market and policy deficiencies that further exacerbate the existing crisis. However, comprehensive and effective action is missing.AimsWe adopt a health system and governance perspective to address the mental health needs of healthcare workers (HCWs), considering the nature of interventions and the levels and actors involved in governance. The aim is to move the debate forward by identifying governance gaps hampering the implementation of health workforce policies and exploring strategies to effectively increase mental health support.Material and MethodsA qualitative comparative methodology is applied based on a case study design utilising a multi‐level intersectoral governance matrix. We conducted a rapid assessment of HCWF developments in the European context (Germany, Portugal, Romania, Switzerland and the United Kingdom), drawing on secondary sources and country experts.Results and DiscussionAwareness of mental health threats among HCWs increased, but policy discourse is driven by service delivery and labour market demands. The attention to HCWs' needs is stronger on the international level and weakest at national/regional levels. Although organisations and professions demonstrate varying degrees of activity, their efforts are scattered and lack sustainability. Similar challenges were identified across healthcare systems, including limited action, disconnected actors, missing coordination, and a lack of attention to governance gaps and system weaknesses.ConclusionAdopting a health system approach is important but not sufficient. Successful mental health policy implementation needs multi‐level governance and coherent coordination mechanisms.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3