Harvest of large fascia lata autograft: Outcomes in 108 patients

Abstract

AbstractPurposeDue to the reclassification of transvaginal mesh as a high‐risk device, there has been renewed interest in the use of fascia lata in pelvic floor reconstruction. Here we report our experience in 108 patients who underwent large fascia lata harvest for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair. Our primary objective was to highlight the postoperative morbidity of the large fascia lata harvest in patients who underwent POP repair using fascia lata autograft.MethodsSurgery involved harvesting a fascia lata graft through a small lateral upper thigh incision and was used for either autologous transvaginal POP repair or autologous sacrocolpopexy. To prevent seroma, a temporary Jackson‐Pratt drain was intraoperatively placed and a mild compression wrap was applied to the area for 4–6 weeks postoperatively. Patient demographics were obtained preoperatively, while physical exam findings and postoperative outcomes related to the fascia lata harvest were collected at sequential follow up visits.ResultsOne‐hundred eight patients underwent 111 large fascia lata harvests for either transvaginal or abdominal/robotic POP repair from July 2016 to January 2022. Mean follow‐up was 19.6 months (range: 1–65) with 38 patients having 24 months or more of follow‐up. Mean Visual Analog Pain (VAP) score was 1 (range: 0–10). Sixteen patients developed asymptomatic thigh bulges, 16 patients developed harvest site seromas (of which 14 resolved), and 59 patients experienced mild, non‐bothersome paresthesia near the incision.ConclusionLarge fascia lata harvest offers a robust autograft for transvaginal or transabdominal POP repair with minimal morbidity. Harvest site complications are minor and typically resolve with expectant management. This technique can be safely utilized in patients who desire graft‐augmented repair of POP without the use of synthetic mesh, allograft, or xenograft.