Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in elderly patients with stage III‐IVa nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A real‐world study based on medical comorbidities

Author:

Jin Ya‐Nan12,Xiao Zhi‐Wen3,Yao Wei2,Yu Jing2,Zhang Wang‐Jian4,Marks Tia5,Zhang Hong‐Yu2,Yao Ji‐Jin2,Xia Liang‐Ping1

Affiliation:

1. VIP Region, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy Sun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou Guangdong China

2. The Cancer Center of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen University Zhuhai Guangdong China

3. Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐Sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China

4. Department of Medical Statistics School of Public Health, Sun Yat‐Sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China

5. Department of Environmental Health Sciences School of Public Health, University at Albany, State University of New York Rensselaer USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo evaluate the outcomes and toxicities of adding neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in elderly (≥65 years) patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC, stage III‐IVa).Methods and MaterialsUsing an NPC‐specific database, 245 elderly patients with stage III‐IVa NPC, receiving CCRT +/− NAC, and an Adult Co‐morbidity Evaluation 27 (ACE‐27) score <2 were included. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) based on TNM stage and Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) DNA were applied for risk stratification. The primary end point was disease‐free survival (DFS).ResultsTwo risk groups were generated by the RPA model. In the high‐risk group (EBV DNA < 4000 copy/ml with stage IVa & EBV DNA ≥4000 copy/ml with stage III‐IVa), patients treated with NAC plus CCRT achieved improved 5‐year DFS rates compared to those who received CCRT alone (56.9% vs. 29.4%; p = 0.003). But we failed to observe the survival benefit of additional NAC in the low‐risk group (EBV DNA <4000 copy/ml with stage III). The most common severe acute toxic effects were leucopenia (46.8% vs. 24.4%) and neutropenia (43.7% vs. 20.2%) in the NAC plus CCRT group versus CCRT group with statistically significant differences.ConclusionsThe addition of NAC to CCRT was associated with better DFS for the high‐risk group of elderly LANPC patients with ACE‐27 score <2. However, the survival benefit of additional NAC was not observed in low‐risk patients.

Funder

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province

National Natural Science Foundation of China

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3