Development and preliminary validation of the Group Cognitive Therapy Scale

Author:

Nakashima Misuzu1ORCID,Matsunaga Miki2,Otani Makoto3,Kuga Hironori4,Fujisawa Daisuke56ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Clinical Research National Hospital Organization Hizen Psychiatric Center Kanzaki Saga Prefecture Japan

2. Department of Psychology Rikkyo University Niiza Saitama Prefecture Japan

3. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine NTT Medical Center Tokyo Tokyo Japan

4. National Center for Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Research National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry Tokyo Japan

5. Division of Patient Safety Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

6. Department of Neuropsychiatry Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

Abstract

AbstractAimThe aim of this research was to create a scale to assess the competency of therapists who conduct group cognitive behavioral therapy (G‐CBT). The scale is intended to serve as a tool to aid the training of therapists.MethodsThree stepped studies were conducted. Process 1: Through literature review and experts' consensus process, essential skills for G‐CBT were articulated and categorized according to the criteria of the Cognitive Therapy Scale, a well‐established rating scale for evaluating clinicians' skills in individual cognitive behavioral therapy. The list of those skills was organized into a rating scale. Process 2: Behavioral anchors were added to each skill and were classified by the levels of difficulty (beginner, intermediate, and advanced levels), based on the rating by G‐CBT experts. Process 3: Inter‐rater reliability and validity of the rating scale were examined in a sample of 41 videotaped G‐CBT sessions of actual clinical sessions and educational role‐plays.ResultsThe 12‐item Group Cognitive Therapy Scale (G‐CTS) was developed. It consists of 11 items that are adapted from the original Cognitive Therapy Scale, and a new 12th item called “Intervention using relationships with other participants,” which describes therapists' skills to address group dynamics. The G‐CTS showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α: 0.95), satisfactory inter‐rater reliability (interclass correlation coefficients: 0.65–0.88), and high predictive validity.ConclusionA novel rating scale to evaluate therapists' competency in G‐CBT was developed and successfully validated. The G‐CTS behavioral checklist created in this study provides concrete guidelines that can be used by therapists to hone their skills in G‐CBT.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference44 articles.

1. Group-based delivery of interventions in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: a scoping review

2. Is Group More Cost Effective than Individual Cognitive Behaviour Therapy? The Evidence is not Solid Yet

3. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. NICE depression: evidence update April 2012: a summary of selected new evidence relevant to NICE clinical Guideline 90 “the treatment and management of depression in adults.”2022.https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng222/chapter/Recommendations#choice-of-treatments

4. Outcomes of psychological therapies for prisoners with mental health problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Development of the trainer skill evaluation scale for metacognitive training;Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences Reports;2024-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3