Determinants of active surveillance uptake in a diverse population‐based cohort of men with low‐risk prostate cancer: The Treatment Options in Prostate Cancer Study (TOPCS)

Author:

Xu Jinping1ORCID,Bock Cathryn H.2ORCID,Janisse James1,Woo Justin1,Cher Michael L.3,Ginsburg Kevin3ORCID,Yacoub Rami4,Goodman Michael4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences School of Medicine Wayne State University Detroit Michigan USA

2. Department of Oncology School of Medicine Wayne State University Detroit Michigan USA

3. Department of Urology School of Medicine Wayne State University Detroit Michigan USA

4. Department of Epidemiology School of Public Health Emory University Atlanta Georgia USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundActive surveillance (AS) is the preferred strategy for low‐risk prostate cancer (LRPC); however, limited data on determinants of AS adoption exist, particularly among Black men.MethodsBlack and White newly diagnosed (from January 2014 through June 2017) patients with LRPC ≤75 years of age were identified through metro‐Detroit and Georgia population‐based cancer registries and completed a survey evaluating factors influencing AS uptake.ResultsAmong 1688 study participants, 57% chose AS (51% of Black participants, 61% of White) over definitive treatment. In the unadjusted analysis, patient factors associated with initial AS uptake included older age, White race, and higher education. However, after adjusting for covariates, none of these factors was significant predictors of AS uptake. The strongest determinant of AS uptake was the AS recommendation by a urologist (adjusted prevalence ratio, 6.59, 95% CI, 4.84–8.97). Other factors associated with the decision to undergo AS included a shared patient–physician treatment decision, greater prostate cancer knowledge, and residence in metro‐Detroit compared with Georgia. Conversely, men whose decision was strongly influenced by the desire to achieve “cure” or “live longer” with treatment and those who perceived their LRPC diagnosis as more serious were less likely to choose AS.ConclusionsIn this contemporary sample, the majority of patients with newly diagnosed LRPC chose AS. Although the input from their urologists was highly influential, several patient decisional and psychological factors were independently associated with AS uptake. These data shed new light on potentially modifiable factors that can help further increase AS uptake among patients with LRPC.

Funder

U.S. Department of Defense

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3