Comparison of four ventilation tubes commonly used in the pediatric population: A retrospective cohort study

Author:

Morrissette Margareta1,Ben‐Dov Tom1ORCID,Santacatterina Michele2,Catháin Éadaoin Ó.1,April Max M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA

2. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo assess differences in otorrhea, tympanic membrane perforation, and time to extrusion in children receiving one of four commonly used, short‐term ventilation tubes for the first time.MethodsRetrospective chart review of 2 years of postoperative follow‐up to analyze patient outcomes after insertion of either a Paparella type‐I Activent, Armstrong Beveled, Modified Armstrong, or Armstrong Microgel ventilation tube. Incidence of complications was determined by reviewing provider notes. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine odds ratios of complications among the four tube types.ResultsA total of 387 patients were reviewed. The mean age was 2.4 years and 35.9% were female. Armstrong beveled tubes had the highest odds of otorrhea. Paparella type‐I tube had the shortest time to extrusion of about 9 months, while Armstrong Beveled had the longest, at almost 19 months. When evaluating episodes of otorrhea each child experienced on average, per month, Armstrong beveled tubes had the highest monthly rate of otorrhea and Paparella type‐I the least. No significant differences were found regarding tympanic membrane perforation.ConclusionsThis retrospective chart review showed that no tube was clinically superior across all complications. The findings from this study may give otolaryngologists an opportunity to consider choosing a specific type of tube according to the clinical situation. The large variations in extrusion times should be considered in terms of patient age, seasonality, and desired duration of tube placement.Level of Evidence4.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3